Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. European values in bioethics: Why, what, and how to be used. [REVIEW]Matti Häyry - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):199-214.
    Are there distinctly European values in bioethics, and if there are, what are they? Some Continental philosophers have argued that the principles of dignity, precaution, and solidarity reflect the European ethos better than the liberal concepts of autonomy, harm, and justice. These principles, so the argument goes, elevate prudence over hedonism, communality over individualism, and moral sense over pragmatism. Contrary to what their proponents often believe, however, dignity, precaution, and solidarity can be interpreted in many ways, and it is not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
    Book reviewed in this article: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. By Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2267 citations  
  • Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Peter N. Herissone-Kelly - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (10):584-587.
    Tom Beauchamp and James Childress have always maintained that their four principles approach (otherwise known as principlism) is a globally applicable framework for biomedical ethics. This claim is grounded in their belief that the principles of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice form part of a 'common morality', or collection of very general norms to which everyone who is committed to morality subscribes. The difficulty, however, has always been how to demonstrate, at least in the absence of a full-blooded (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Anarchists for health: Spanish anarchism and health reform in the 1930s. Part I: Anarchism, neo-malthusianism, eugenics and concepts of health. [REVIEW]Richard Cleminson - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (1):61-67.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Solidarity and the common good: An analytic framework.William Rehg - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (1):7–21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Lord Samuel's Speech at Lord Halsbury's Reception.[author unknown] - 1959 - Philosophy 34 (131):377-381.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   240 citations  
  • The principlist approach to bioethics and its stormy journey overseas.P. Herissone-Kelly - 2003 - In Matti Häyry & Tuija Takala (eds.), Scratching the surface of bioethics. New York: Rodopi. pp. 65--77.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Are there limits to caring?: Conflict between autonomy and beneficence.A. Davis - 1990 - In Madeleine M. Leininger (ed.), Ethical and moral dimensions of care. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. pp. 25--32.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations