Switch to: Citations

References in:

The Respect Fallacy: Limits of Respect in Public Dialogue

In Christian Kock & Lisa Villadsen (ed.), Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation (pp. 77-92). Pennsylvania State University Press (2012)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University of Toronto Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   127 citations  
  • L'autorità Della Morale.Carla Bagnoli - 2007 - Feltrinelli.
    Capitolo I Il rispetto e l'ideale morale 1.1. Angeli, bruti e agenti 1.2. Il rispetto dell'altro 1.3. Il rispetto di sé 1.4. Auto−riflessione e auto−legislazione 1.5. Autonomia e individualità 1.6. Il rispetto e l'attenzione 1.7. Il rispetto e l'amore.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Two Kinds of Respect.Stephen Darwall - 1977 - Ethics 88 (1):36-49.
    S. 39: "My project in this paper is to develop the initial distinction which I have drawn between recognition and appraisal respect into a more detailed and specific account of each. These accounts will not merely be of intrinsic interest. Ultimately I will use them to illuminate the puzzles with which this paper began and to understand the idea of self-respect." 42 " Thus, insofar as respect within such a pursuit will depend on an appraisal of the participant from the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   393 citations  
  • Is Common Ground a Word or Just a Sound?Paola Cantù - 2007 - In H. V. Hanson (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference: Dissensus & The Search for Common Ground. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1--9.
    The paper analyses the role played by the concept of ‘common ground’ in argumentation theories. If a common agreement on all the rules of a discursive exchange is required, either at the beginning or at the end of an argumentative practice, then no violation of the rules is possible. The paper suggests an alternative understanding of ‘common ground’ as something that can change during the development of the argumentative practice, and in particular something that can change without the practice being (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Norms of Legitimate Dissensus.Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (2):179-196.
    The paper calls for argumentation theory to learn from moral and political philosophy. Several thinkers in these fields help understand the occurrence of what we may call legitimate dissensus: enduring disagreement even between reasonable people arguing reasonably. It inevitably occurs over practical issues, e.g., issues of action rather than truth, because there will normally be legitimate arguments on both sides, and these will be incommensurable, i.e., they cannot be objectively weighed against each other. Accordingly, ‘inference,’ ‘validity,’ and ‘sufficiency’ are inapplicable (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Respect and the Second-Person Standpoint.Stephen Darwall - 2004 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78 (2):43 - 59.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • The Idea of Equality.Williams Bernard - 1973 - In . Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • The Decent Society.Avishai Margalit - 1997 - Ethics 107 (4):729-731.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  • Re-Faming Justice in a Globalizing World.Nancy Fraser - 2007 - In Terry Lovell (ed.), (Mis)Recognition, Social Inequality and Social Justice: Nancy Fraser and Pierre Bourdieu. Routledge.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations