Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Role of Culture and Gender in the Relationship between Positive and Negative Affect.Richard P. Bagozzi, Nancy Wong & Youjae Yi - 1999 - Cognition and Emotion 13 (6):641-672.
    An integrative explanation proposes that culture and gender interact to produce fundamentally different patterns of association between positive and negative emotions. People in independent-based cultures (e.g. the United States) experience emotions in oppositional (i.e. bipolar) ways, whereas people in interdependent-based cultures (e.g. China) experience emotions in dialectic ways. These patterns are stronger for women than men in both cultures. In support of the theory, Study 1 showed that positive and negative emotions are strongly correlated inversely for American women and weakly (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Cultural differences in the dialectical and non-dialectical emotional styles and their implications for health.Yuri Miyamoto & Carol D. Ryff - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (1):22-39.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.James A. Russell - 2003 - Psychological Review 110 (1):145-172.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   441 citations  
  • The Heart's Eye: Emotional Influences in Perception and Attention.Paula M. Niedenthal & Shinobu Kitayama (eds.) - 1994 - Academic Press.
    Discusses conceptual models and research findings into how affect influences non-conscious processing. Divided into two sections, the book discusses affect and perception, and affect and attention.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.Richard E. Nisbett, Kaiping Peng, Incheol Choi & Ara Norenzayan - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (2):291-310.
    The authors find East Asians to be holistic, attending to the entire field and assigning causality to it, making relatively little use of categories and formal logic, and relying on "dialectical" reasoning, whereas Westerners, are more analytic, paying attention primarily to the object and the categories to which it belongs and using rules, including formal logic, to understand its behavior. The 2 types of cognitive processes are embedded in different naive metaphysical systems and tacit epistemologies. The authors speculate that the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   284 citations  
  • Cultural influences on the relation between pleasant emotions and unpleasant emotions: Asian dialectic philosophies or individualism-collectivism?Ulrich Schimmack, Shigehiro Oishi & Ed Diener - 2002 - Cognition and Emotion 16 (6):705-719.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • What is Basic about Basic Emotions? Lasting Lessons from Affective Neuroscience.Jaak Panksepp & Douglas Watt - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (4):387-396.
    A cross-species affective neuroscience strategy for understanding the primary-process (basic) emotions is defended. The need for analyzing the brain and mind in terms of evolutionary stratification of functions into at least primary (instinctual), secondary (learned), and tertiary (thought-related) processes is advanced. When viewed in this context, the contentious battles between basic-emotion theorists and dimensional-constructivist approaches can be seen to be largely nonsubstantial differences among investigators working at different levels of analysis.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations