55 found
Order:
Disambiguations
David Estlund [50]David M. Estlund [5]
  1. Utopophobia.David Estlund - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2):113-134.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   92 citations  
  2. Human Nature and the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy.David Estlund - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (3):207-237.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   107 citations  
  3. Opinion leaders, independence, and Condorcet's Jury Theorem.David M. Estlund - 1994 - Theory and Decision 36 (2):131-162.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   75 citations  
  4. Debate: Liberalism, equality, and fraternity in Cohen's critique of Rawls.David Estlund - 1998 - Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1):99–112.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  5. The insularity of the reasonable: Why political liberalism must admit the truth.David Estlund - 1998 - Ethics 108 (2):252-275.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  6. Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority.David Estlund - 1997 - In James Bohman & William Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. MIT Press. pp. 173-204.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  7. On following orders in an unjust war.David Estlund - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (2):213–234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  8. The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.David Estlund - 2018 - In André Bächtiger, Jane Mansbridge, John Dryzek & Mark Warren (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  9. Making Truth Safe For Democracy.David Estlund - 1993 - In David Copp, Jean Hampton & John E. Roemer (eds.), The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 71-100.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  10. Methodological moralism in political philosophy.David Estlund - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (3):385-402.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  11. Prime justice.David Estlund - 2017 - In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oup Usa.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  12. Democracy without preference.David M. Estlund - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (3):397-423.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  13. Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited.David Estlund & Jeremy Waldron - 1989 - American Political Science Review 83 (4):1217-1322.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  14. Why Not Epistocracy?David Estlund - 2003 - In Naomi Reshotko & Terry Penner (eds.), Desire, identity, and existence: essays in honor of T.M. Penner. Kelowna, B.C., Canada: Academic Print. &. pp. 53-69.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  15. Political Quality.David Estlund - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (1):127.
    Political equality is in tension with political quality, and quality has recently been neglected. My thesis is that proper attention to the quality of democratic procedures and their outcomes requires that we accept substantive inequalities of political input in the interest of increasing input overall. Mainly, I hope to refute political egalitarianism, the view that justice or legitimacy requires substantive political equality, specifically equal availability of power or influence over collective choices that have legal force. I hope to show that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  16. Reply to Wiens.David Estlund - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 15 (3):353-362.
    In Human Nature and the Limits of Political Philosophy, I argued that justice might require things of people that they cannot bring themselves to do. A central step was to argue that this does not entail an inability to ‘do’ the putatively required thing. David Wiens challenges that argument of mine, and this piece is my reply.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  17. The survival of egalitarian justice in John Rawls's political liberalism.David Estlund - 1996 - Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (1):68–78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  18. Who's Afraid of Deliberative Democracy? The Strategic / Deliberative Dichotomy in Recent Constitutional Jurisprudence.David Estlund - 1993 - Texas Law Review 71 (1992-1993):1437-1477.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  19. Just and Juster.David Estlund - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 2.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  20. Deliberation Down and Dirty: Must Political Expression Be Civil?David Estlund - 2001 - In Thomas R. Hensley (ed.), The Boundaries of Freedom of Expression and Order in American Democracy. Kent State University Press. pp. 49-67.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  21. Jeremy Waldron on law and disagreement.David Estlund - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 99 (1):111-128.
    Waldron argues that recent treatments of justice have neglected reasonable disagreement about justice itself. So Waldron offers a procedural account of democratic legitimacy, in which contending views of justice can be brought together to arrive at a decision without deciding which one is correct. However, if there is reasonable disagreement about everything, then this includes his preferred account of legitimacy. On the other hand, it is not clear that Waldron is right to count so much disagreement as reasonable. But then (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  22. Political authority and the tyranny of non‐consent.David Estlund - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):351–367.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  23. One Person, At Least One Vote? Rawls on Political Equality…Within Limits.David Estlund - 2023 - In Paul J. Weithman (ed.), Rawls's 'A theory of justice' at 50. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. Rawls's A Theory of Justice at 5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Introduction: Epistemic approaches to democracy.David Estlund - 2008 - Episteme 5 (1):pp. 1-4.
    The papers published in this special issue can fairly be unified under the heading “Epistemic Democracy,” but there is more variety among them than this might indicate. They exhibit the broad range of ways in which epistemological considerations are figuring in contemporary philosophical discussions of democracy. The authors range from young and promising to established and distinguished. I'd like to introduce a few of the issues that run through the papers, sprinkling references to the actual papers along the way. From (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  25. The Truth in Political Liberalism.David Estlund - 2010 - In Andrew Norris & Jeremy Elkins (eds.), Truth and Democratic Politics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  26. Replies to Critics (on Utopophobia).David Estlund - 2023 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 2023 (2):321-336.
    I reply to several pieces of commentary on my recent book.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Reply to Copp, Gaus, Richardson, and Edmundson.David Estlund - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):354-389.
    This piece is a response to four essays that critically discuss my book Democratic Authority. In addition to responding to their specific criticisms, it takes up several methodological issues that put some of the critiques in a broader context. Among the issues discussed are “normative consent,” which I offer as a new theory of authority; the “general acceptability requirement,” which advances a broadly Rawlsian approach to political justification; and methodological questions about theory building, including a device I dub the “method (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  28. The persuasiveness of democratic majorities.Robert E. Goodin & David Estlund - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):131-142.
    Under the assumptions of the standard Condorcet Jury Theorem, majority verdicts are virtually certain to be correct if the competence of voters is greater than one-half, and virtually certain to be incorrect if voter competence is less than one-half. But which is the case? Here we turn the Jury Theorem on its head, to provide one way of addressing that question. The same logic implies that, if the outcome saw 60 percent of voters supporting one proposition and 40 percent the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  29. The Democracy/Contractualism Analogy.David Estlund - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (4):387-412.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  30. Debate: On Christiano's the constitution of equality.David Estlund - 2009 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2):241-252.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  31. Democratic theory.David Estlund - 2005 - In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 208--30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  32. Democracy and the Real Speech Situation.David Estlund - 2006 - In Jose Luis Marti & Samantha Besson (eds.), Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents. Routledge. pp. 75-92.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33. Mutual benevolence and the theory of happiness.David M. Estlund - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):187-204.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34. The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority.David Estlund - 1997 - Modern Schoolman 74 (4):259-276.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  35. G. A. Cohen’s critique of the Original Position.David Estlund - 2015 - In Timothy Hinton (ed.), The Original Position. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Moreau on Discrimination and Wrong.David Estlund - 2022 - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 25 (1):84-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Democracy Counts.David Estlund - 2012 - In J. Elster & H. Landemore (eds.), Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Epistemic Proceduralism and Democratic Authority.David Estlund - 2008 - In Raf Greenens & Ronald Tinnevelt (eds.), Does Truth Matter? Democracy and Public Space. Springer.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Normative consent and authority.David Estlund - 2018 - In Peter Schaber & Andreas Müller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. The Persistent Puzzle of the Minority Democrat.David M. Estlund - 1989 - American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (2):143 - 151.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  41. The Audacious Humility of John Rawls.David Estlund - 2003 - Dissent.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Comments on Alon Harel, "Why Law Matters".David Estlund - 2015 - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 2015:1-9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Reply to three commentators (symposium on "Democratic Authority").David Estlund - 2009 - Iyyun, The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 58 (January 2009):73-88.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Comments on Geoffrey Sayre-McCord.David Estlund - 2002 - In Social, Political and Legal Philosophy. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45. What’s Circumstantial About Justice?David Estlund - 2016 - Social Philosophy and Policy 33 (1-2):292-311.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  98
    The Visit & The Video: Publication and the Line Between Sex and Speech.David Estlund - 1997 - In David Estlund & Martha Nussbaum (eds.), Sex, Preference, and Family. Oxford University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47. Liberal associationism and the rights of states.David Estlund - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):425-449.
    It is often argued that if one holds a liberal political philosophy about individual rights against the state and the community, then one cannot consistently say that a state that violates those principles is owed the right of noninterference. How could the rights of the collective trump the rights of individuals in a liberal view? I believe that this debate calls for more reflection, on the relation between liberalism and individualism. I will sketch a conception of liberalism in which there (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Replies to critics.David Estlund - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (7):2439-2472.
    I offer replies to critical comments on my book, Utopophobia: On the Limits of Political Philosophy, in four pieces appearing in the same issue of this journal.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. On Sunstein's Infotopia.David Estlund - 2009 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 56 (119):14-29.
    Sunstein argues that democratic theory has recently rested its normative claims on a vast but empirically uninformed optimism about the ability of collective deliberation to lead to morally and rationally better decisions. Once that question is considered empirically, he argues, deliberation turns out to be mixed at best, and a disaster at worst. I want to suggest that Sunstein exaggerates the claims of the deliberative democrats, and interprets the empirical literature against deliberation in a way that appears, even based on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50. What's So Rickety? Richardson's Non‐Epistemic Democracy.David Estlund - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):204-204.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 55