This monograph critically investigates the philosophical foundations of communication theory as shaped in the pre-digital decades of the 1960s and 1970s. It begins by challenging the limits of established linguistic models, focusing especially on Chomsky’s transformational-generative grammar. The first chapter examines Chomsky’s shift from empiricism to formal abstraction, highlighting both the cognitive ambitions and the implicit political assumptions of his theory. The second chapter turns to the body as a site of meaning, analyzing the rise of non-verbal communication and its (...) psychological and sociological implications. Here, the author makes a critical assessment of the simplistic equation of human gesture with instinctive behavior, arguing instead for a fundamentally existential difference. The third and final chapter deepen this inquiry through existentialist thought — drawing on Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Jaspers — to show that communication is not simply the transfer of information, but an ontological event bound to human finitude, freedom, and co-being. Communication emerges as a mode of being-with, shaped by temporality, absence, and the struggle for authenticity. The work as a whole challenges technocratic and utilitarian reductions of language, offering instead a philosophical groundwork for a future Age of Access, in which communication must be thought beyond code, function, and control — as a shared existential adventure. (shrink)

The following paper is dedicated to the 21st century’s “recent marriage” between the aesthetics of beauty and elegance on the one hand, and the ethics of choice on the other, involved in the “humanizing mission” of AI digital assistance. In the context of the 4.0 Social Revolution it will be shown how modern aesthetic concepts of AI design can go hand in hand with the ethics of choice, because of their inherent connection, backtracked in earlier moments of European history, and (...) expanded around the French Revolution in Schiller’s 27 letters On Aesthetic Education of Man as well as earlier in Leibniz holistic aesthetics. Relevant arguments will be discussed here to disclose the “secrets” of how the inherent connection is to be carried out within the metaphysical background of faith, even if modern 20th century attitude has seemingly dismissed its “p hilosop hical burden” during the late 1970-ies. In 2011 a “New Aesthetics” was introduced without the burden of metaphysics, aiming to create a new “lens” for the perception of elegance, simplicity and clarity by young “digitally naïve” Avantgarde artists. However, elegance and beauty have previously been claimed by algorithmic solutions, starting with Leibniz and Condorcet, which gave birth to the 20th century computational aesthetics. The social life of AI algorithms – we cannot perceive them as humans – seems mostly intended to optimize corporate solutions. But the 21st century artists are about to take their chances on creating something new that makes us feel artificial intelligence as an integral part of a beautiful mind. AI algorithms can offer smart solutions, but the wisdom of choice has to remain a human call. (shrink)