11 found
Order:
See also
Mohammad Bagher Ghomi
University of Tehran
  1. Plato Seeking for “One Real Explanation” in Phaedo.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - manuscript
    This essay intends to discuss what Plato was seeking as an explanation in Phaedo. In this dialogue, we observe Socrates criticizing both the natural scientists’ explanations and Anaxagoras’ theory of Mind because they could not explain all things, firstly, in a unitary and, secondary, in a real way. Thence, we are to call what Plato is seeking as his ideal explanation in Phaedo “One Real Explanation”. He talks at least about three kinds of explanation, two of which, the confused and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. An Onto-Epistemological Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - manuscript
    This paper aims to suggest a new arrangement of Plato’s dialogues based on a different theory of the ontological as well as epistemological development of his philosophy. In this new arrangement, which proposes essential changes in the currently agreed upon chronology of the dialogues, Parmenides must be considered as criticizing an elementary theory of Forms and not the theory of so-called middle dialogues. Dated all as later than Parmenides, the so-called middle and late dialoguesare regarded as two consecutive endeavors to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Plato’s Metaphysical Development Before Middle Period Dialogues.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - manuscript
    Regarding the relation of Plato’s early and middle period dialogues, scholars have been divided to two opposing groups: unitarists and developmentalists. While developmentalists try to prove that there are some noticeable and even fundamental differences between Plato’s early and middle period dialogues, the unitarists assert that there is no essential difference in there. The main goal of this article is to suggest that some of Plato’s ontological as well as epistemological principles change, both radically and fundamentally, between the early and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  87
    A Critique of the Standard Chronology of Plato's Dialogues.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - manuscript
    That i) there is a somehow determined chronology of Plato’s dialogues among all the chronologies of the last century and ii) this theory is subject to many objections, are points this article intends to discuss. Almost all the main suggested chronologies of the last century agree that Parmenides and Theaetetus should be located after dialogues like Meno, Phaedo and Republic and before Sophist, Politicus, Timaeus, Laws and Philebus. The eight objections we brought against this arrangement claim that to place the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  50
    Πολλαχῶς Ἔστι; Plato’s Neglected Ontology.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - manuscript
    This paper aims to suggest a new approach to Plato’s theory of being in Republic V and Sophist based on the notion of difference and the being of a copy. To understand Plato’s ontology in these two dialogues we are going to suggest a theory we call Pollachos Esti; a name we took from Aristotle’s pollachos legetai both to remind the similarities of the two structures and to reach a consistent view of Plato’s ontology. Based on this theory, when Plato (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. اصول وجود- معرفت شناختي محاورات اوليه افلاطون.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - 2015 - Hasti Va Shenakht 2 (1):37-54.
    در اين جستار بر آنيم اصول وجود شناختي و معرفت شناختي افلاطون در محاورات اوليه و علي الخصوص لاخس، خارميدس، اوثيفرون، اوتيدموس و هيپياس بزرگ را بر مبناي سه عنصر آنچه «دور سقراطي» مي ناميم يعني پرسش سقراطي، ادعاي سقراطي انكار دانش و النخوس مورد بررسي قرار دهيم. حاصل اين بررسي شش اصل وجود - معرفت شناختي است: شناخت الف، معرفت‌شناسي دوقطبي، وجودشناسي دو‌قطبي، معرفت گسسته، وجود گسسته و معرفت وجود. اگرچه اين اصول عمدتاً جديد نبوده و پيشتر مورد بحث (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  38
    بررسی تبییین کانت از قوای تخیل و فاهمه در نقدهای اول و سوم.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - 2010 - Zehn 41 (11):109-129.
    بررسی تبییین کانت از قوای تخیل و فاهمه در نقدهای اول و سوم.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  34
    پیش سقراطیان ارسطویی.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - 2014 - متافیزیک 18 (6):17-32.
    در اين مقاله تلاش مي‌كنیم روايت ارسطو از پيش‌سقراطيان را بر اساس متون خود ارسطو و عمدتاً با استفاده از كتاب‌هاي متافيزيك، فيزيك و كون و فساد مورد بررسي قرار دهیم و نشان دهيم چگونه ارسطو همه پيش‌سقراطيان را به يك نحو و بر مبناي چهارچوب فلسفه خودتفسير مي‌كند. او آرخه پيش‌سقراطي را به معناي عنصر يعني امري بسيط كه خود از چيز ديگري نيست و همه چيز از آن تركيب شده است، تفسير مي كند و حتي آن را به (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  58
    کرونولوژی وجود – معرفت شناختی آثار افلاطون.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - 2015 - Zehn 60:87-127.
    در اين جستار برآنيم كه ترتيبي جديد از محاورات افلاطون ارائه نمائيم؛ ترتيبي كه بر مبناي توسعه وجودشناختي و معرفت شناختي افلاطون مبتني است و تفاوت‌هاي اساسي با كرونولوژي غالب امروزي محاورات دارد. در حاليكه در همه كرونولوژي هاي پذيرفته شده فعلي، پارمنيدس به عنوان نقد نظريه مثال در محاورات مياني و بنابراين متأخر از اين محاورات در نظر گرفته مي‌شود، كرونولوژي پيشنهادي ما پارمنيدس را پس از محاورات اوليه و پيش از محاورات مياني قرار مي‌دهد. بر اساس اين تغيير (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  20
    بررسی امکان حکم تاملی در نقد عقل محض.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - 2014 - هستی و شناخت 1 (1):85-102.
    کانت در نقد قوه حکم نوعی حکم را به عنوان حکم تاملی معرفی می کند.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  96
    The Development of Ontology and Epistemology in Plato's Philosophy.Mohammad Bagher Ghomi - manuscript
    Investigating Plato’s ontological as well as epistemological status in each of his dialogues, this book is going to challenge the current theories of Plato’s development and suggest a new theory. Regarding the relation of Plato’s early and middle period dialogues, scholars have been divided to two opposing groups: unitarists and developmentalists. While developmentalists try to prove that there are some noticeable and even fundamental differences between Plato’s early and middle period dialogues, the unitarists assert that there is no essential difference (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark