Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Should Moral Bioenhancement Be Covert? A Response to Crutchfield.Louis Austin-Eames - 2023 - Neuroethics 16 (3):1-13.
    Crutchfield (Crutchfield in Bioethics 33:112–121, [4]) has argued that if moral bioenhancement (MBE) ought to be compulsory, then it ought to be covert. More precisely, they argue that MBE is a public health intervention, and for this reason should be governed by public health ethics. Taking from various public health frameworks, Crutchfield provides an array of values to consider, such as: utility, liberty, equality, transparency, social trust, and autonomy. Subsequently, they argue that a covert MBE programme does better than an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What drives public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement and why it matters: an exploratory study.Vojin Rakić, Marko Galjak & Marina Budić - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-14.
    The paper represents an empirical study of public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement. Moral bioenhancement implies the improvement of moral dispositions, i.e. an increase in the moral value of the actions or character of a moral agent. The views of bioethicists and scientists on this topic are present in the ongoing debate, but not the view of the public in general. In order to bridge the gap between the philosophical debate and the view of the public, we have examined attitudes towards (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark