Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Généalogie du principe d’équité horizontale. Une contribution à l’histoire de la normativité en théorie des finances publiques.Maxime Desmarais-Tremblay - 2022 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 22 (2):149-176.
    On doit à l’économiste américain d’origine allemande, Richard A. Musgrave, la formulation des critères d’Équité Horizontale (ÉH) et d’Équité Verticale (ÉV). Étant donnée une base fiscale, l’ÉH veut que les égaux soient traités également, alors que l’ÉV exige que les inégaux soient traités inégalement (par exemple que les plus riches payent proportionnellement plus d’impôts). Musgrave opère en 1959 une redescription créative de considérations d’équité qui ont une longue histoire de Hobbes à Buchanan, en passant notamment par la fameuse maxime de (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Interpersonal Comparisons of What?Jean Baccelli - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy 120 (1):5-41.
    I examine the once popular claim according to which interpersonal comparisons of welfare are necessary for social choice. I side with current social choice theorists in emphasizing that, on a narrow construal, this necessity claim is refuted beyond appeal. However, I depart from the opinion presently prevailing in social choice theory in highlighting that on a broader construal, this claim proves not only compatible with, but even comforted by, the current state of the field. I submit that all in all, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Philippe Mongin (1950-2020).Jean Baccelli & Marcus Pivato - 2021 - Theory and Decision 90 (1):1-9.
    An obituary of Philippe Mongin (1950-2020).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In Defence of Intertemporal Consistency. A Discussion of Craig Callender’s ‘The Normative Standard for Future Discounting’.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2021 - Australasian Philosophical Review 5 (3):266-276.
    While broadly in agreement with the conclusion that the exponentially discounted utility model (EDU) is not a universally valid rationality standard, I want to defend some intertemporal rationality criteria related to EDU, which Craig Callender might not share. My commentary explores the tension between these intuitions and Callender's arguments. In the first place, I show that many of the concerns that he raises are in fact compatible with intertemporal consistency (and sometimes even with EDU). Secondly, I rebut those arguments that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation