Was Dave Chappelle Morally Obliged to Leave Comedy? On the Limits of Consequentialism

The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 1 (1):135-152 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dave Chappelle took an extended leave from comedy for moral reasons. I argue that, while he had every right to leave comedy because of his moral concerns, he was not obliged to do so. To make this case, I present Chappelle’s argument that the potential negative consequences of his racial humor obliged him to leave. Next, I argue against Chappelle’s argument about avoidable harms as the harms are not his responsibility, he was not being negligent, and the benefits of his humor outweigh the harms. I also argue in support of the intuition that another’s failure of comprehension or moral character, even if that failure will predictably result in harms to others, should not convert moral acts into immoral ones.

Author's Profile

Phillip Deen
University of New Hampshire, Manchester

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-27

Downloads
665 (#23,306)

6 months
303 (#7,158)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?