Why “sex as a biological variable” conflicts with precision medicine initiatives

Cell Reports Medicine 10050 (3):1-3 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Policies that require male-female sex comparisons in all areas of biomedical research conflict with the goal of improving health outcomes through context-sensitive individualization of medical care. Sex, like race, requires a rigorous, contextual approach in precision medicine. A “sex contextualist” approach to gender-inclusive medicine better aligns with this aim.

Author Profiles

Helen Zhao
Johns Hopkins University
Marion Boulicault
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Marina DiMarco
University of Pittsburgh

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-23

Downloads
307 (#55,131)

6 months
123 (#32,397)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?