Assessing the Efficacy of Argument Diagramming to Teach Critical Thinking Skills in Introduction to Philosophy

Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):31-39 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After determining one set of skills that we hoped our students were learning in the introductory philosophy class at Carnegie Mellon University, we performed an experiment twice over the course of two semesters to test whether they were actually learning these skills. In addition, there were four different lectures of this course in the first semester, and five in the second; in each semester students in some lectures were taught the material using argument diagrams as a tool to aid understanding and critical evaluation, while the other students were taught using more traditional methods. In each lecture, the students were given a pre-test at the beginning of the semester, and a structurally identical post-test at the end. We determined that the students did develop the skills in which we were interested over the course of the semester. We also determined that the students who were taught argument diagramming gained significantly more than the students who were not. We conclude that learning how to construct argument diagrams significantly improves a student’s ability to analyze arguments.

Author's Profile

Maralee Harrell
University of California, San Diego

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
382 (#57,057)

6 months
103 (#52,477)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?