Episteme 19 (First View):1-20 (
forthcoming)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
A group is lying when it makes a statement that it believes to be untrue but wants the
addressee(s) to believe. But how can we distinguish statements that the group believes
to be untrue from honest group statements based on mistaken beliefs or confusion within
the group? I will suggest a narrative constraint for honest group statements, made up of
two components. Narrative coherence requires that a new group statement should not conflict
with group knowledge on the matter, or beliefs of relevant operative subgroups, unless
a coherent rationale is given. Narrative intention looks at the process of gathering new evidence
on the area of expertise of the group and requires that the group position behind the
statement is formed in good faith. The narrative constraint will help to distinguish group
lies from more innocent erroneous statements of group beliefs when there is an internal
disagreement within the group, including in cases involving spokespersons.