Abstract
Suppose Molinism is true and God placed Adam in the garden because God knew
Adam would freely eat of the fruit. Suppose further that, had it not been true that
Adam would freely eat of the fruit, were he placed in the garden, God would have
placed someone else there instead. When Adam freely eats of the fruit, is he free to
do otherwise? This paper argues that there is a strong case for both a positive and
a negative answer. Assuming such cases are possible under Molinism, we are left
with a puzzling question: if Molinism is true, what can you do?