Is There A Logic of the Ineffable? Or, How Is it Possible to Talk About the Unsayable?

In Nahum Brown & J. Aaron Simmons (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy. Springer. pp. 71-80 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter defends a single, fixed, definite answer to the question: Is there a logic that governs the unsayable? The proposed answer is: “Yes, and no. Or yes-but-not-yes. And/or yes-no.” Each component of this answer is examined and used to generate three laws of what I call “synthetic logic”, which correspond directly to the laws of classical (Aristotelian) logic: the law of contradiction (“A=-A”), the law of non-identity (“A≠A”), and the law of the included middle (“-(Av-A)”). We can talk about the unsayable only by assuming that propositions constructed in accordance with these three alternative logical laws can be meaningful.

Author's Profile

Stephen R. Palmquist
Hong Kong Baptist University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-16

Downloads
315 (#53,737)

6 months
87 (#53,343)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?