The Predictive Turn in Neuroscience

Philosophy of Science 89 (5):1213-1222 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neuroscientists have in recent years turned to building models that aim to generate predictions rather than explanations. This “predictive turn” has swept across domains including law, marketing, and neuropsychiatry. Yet the norms of prediction remain undertheorized relative to those of explanation. I examine two styles of predictive modeling and show how they exemplify the normative dynamics at work in prediction. I propose an account of how predictive models, conceived of as technological devices for aiding decision-making, can come to be adequate for purposes that are defined by both their guiding research questions and their larger social context of application.

Author's Profile

Daniel Weiskopf
Georgia State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-17

Downloads
407 (#53,936)

6 months
91 (#61,510)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?