Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Feminist Epistemologies.Linda Alcoff & Elizabeth Potter (eds.) - 1992 - New York: Routledge.
    "First Published in 1992, Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.".
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  • Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy.Tom Regan (ed.) - 2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Regan provides the theoretical framework that grounds a responsible pro-animal rights perspective, and ultimately explores how asking moral questions about other animals can lead to a better understanding of ourselves.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Are 'old wives' tales' justified.Vrinda Dalmiya & Linda Alcoff - 1992 - In Linda Alcoff & Elizabeth Potter (eds.), Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge. pp. 217--244.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • Transgenesis in Animal Agriculture: Addressing Animal Health and Welfare Concerns. [REVIEW]Michael Greger - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):451-472.
    The US Food and Drug Administration’s final Guidance for Industry on the regulation of transgenesis in animal agriculture has paved the way for the commercialization of genetically engineered (GE) farm animals. The production-related diseases associated with extant breeding technologies are reviewed, as well as the predictable welfare consequences of continued emphasis on prolificacy at the potential expense of physical fitness. Areas in which biotechnology could be used to improve the welfare of animals while maintaining profitability are explored along with regulatory (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Animal rights, human wrongs.Tom Regan - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):99-120.
    In this essay, I explore the moral foundations of the treatment of animals. Alternative views are critically examined, including (a) the Kantian account, which holds that our duties regarding animals are actually indirect duties to humanity; (b) the cruelty account, which holds that the idea of cruelty explains why it is wrong to treat animals in certain ways; and (c) the utilitarian account, which holds that the value of consequences for all sentient creatures explains our duties to animals. These views (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 4 (1):115-121.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Routledge.
    _Brute Science_ investigates whether biomedical research using animals is, in fact, scientifically justified. Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks examine the issues in scientific terms using the models that scientists themselves use. They argue that we need to reassess our use of animals and, indeed, rethink the standard positions in the debate.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Foreword.Bernard E. Rollin - 2008 - In Susan Jean Armstrong & Richard George Botzler (eds.), The animal ethics reader. New York: Routledge.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Feminist epistemologies.Linda Alcoff & Elizabeth Potter (eds.) - 1993 - New York: Routledge.
    "First Published in 1992, Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.".
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  • Animal biotechnology: How not to presume.Paul B. Thompson - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):49 – 50.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations