L'article se propose de revisiter le thème de la déification chez Origène à la lumière de plusieurs perspectives: lexique, références scripturaires, aspects exégétiques et théologiques. La doctrine origénienne se manifeste sous plusieurs facettes. La déification s'articule a l'intérieur d'un discours biblique et sotériologique. La divinisation de l'homme, engageant aussi son corps selon le modèle archétypique de Christ ressucité, débouche finalement sur l'immortalité et l'incorruption retrouvées autant que sur la pleine acquisition de la condition de fils adoptifs de Dieu.

This paper examines a passage in the Theaetetus where Plato distinguishes knowledge from true belief by appealing to the example of a jury hearing a case. While the jurors may have true belief, Socrates puts forward two reasons why they cannot achieve knowledge. The reasons for this nescience have typically been taken to be in tension with each other . This paper proposes a solution to the putative difficulty by arguing that what links the two cases of nescience is that (...) in neither case do the jurors act from an epistemic virtue and that doing so is a necessary condition of knowledge. Appreciating that it is a necessary condition of knowledge that it be the result of an epistemic agent's agency in a distinctive way provides a satisfying solution to the difficulty Burnyeat detected and also does justice to an otherwise neglected aspect of Plato's epistemology: his talk of cognitive capacities and virtues and his focus on what it is that is active and passive in epistemic processes. (shrink)