Switch to: References

Citations of:

The age of the universe

Philosophy of Science 50 (1):130-145 (1983)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. More on Russell's hypothesis.Hilton Hinderliter - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):703-711.
    Previous articles on Russell's hypothesis and on criteria for scientific explanations are used as a springboard for analyzing some modern trends in science. Specifically, recent suggestions of the concept of "creation from nothing" in Big-Bang cosmology are compared to Russell's hypothesis, in light of James Woodward's criteria for an explanation purporting to be scientific. The discussion is then extended to the broader question of the direction of scientific theorizing, through examples showing that one generation's science may not build conformably upon (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Did the intensity of my preferences double last night?Roy A. Sorensen - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (2):282-285.
    About twenty years ago, philosophers debated the verifiability of the statement “Last night everything doubled in size.” It seems that universal nocturnal expansion would double our rulers and tape measures making the size change indiscernible. I think that there is an internal analogue to the question “Did everything double in size last night?” The question “Did my preferences double in intensity last night?“ also raises problems of verification.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Are we only five minutes old? Acock on the age of the universe.Joseph Wayne Smith & Sharyn Ward - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):511-513.
    Malcolm Acock attempts to show that three widely accepted “solutions” to the philosophical problem of theory choice between the ordinary account of the age of the universe, and “Russell's hypothesis” that the world sprang into existence five minutes ago, are unsatisfactory. In the following paper we shall attempt to show why “Russell's hypothesis” is defective as a cosmological explanation of the age of the universe.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation