Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Thomistic Solution to the Deep Problem for Perfectionism.Matthew Shea & James Kintz - 2022 - Utilitas 34 (4):461-467.
    Perfectionism is the view that what is intrinsically good is the fulfillment of human nature or the development and exercise of the characteristic human capacities. An important objection to the theory is what Gwen Bradford calls the “Deep Problem”: explaining why nature-fulfillment is good. We argue that situating perfectionism within a Thomistic metaethical framework and adopting Aquinas's account of the metaphysical “convertibility” of being and goodness gives us a solution to the Deep Problem. In short, the fulfillment of human nature (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Comprehending the Whole: Methodological Principles Governing Aristotelian Metaphysics and Ethics.Jason Costanzo - 2016 - In Dôdôni, the Annuaire Scientifique of the Department of Philosophy of the University of Ioannina:29-39.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Being and goodness.David S. Oderberg - unknown
    The old scholastic principle of the "convertibility" of being and goodness strikes nearly all moderns as either barely comprehensible or plain false. "Convertible" is a term of art meaning "interchangeable" in respect of predication, where the predicates can be exchanged salva veritate albeit not salva sensu: their referents are, as the maxim goes, really the same albeit conceptually different. The principle seems, at first blush, absurd. Did the scholastics literally mean that every being is good? Is that supposed to include (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Spinoza and the Inevitable Perfection of Being.Sanja Särman - 2019 - Dissertation, The University of Hong Kong
    Metaphysics and ethics are two distinct fields in academic philosophy. The object of metaphysics is what is, while the object of ethics is what ought to be. Necessitarianism is a modal doctrine that appears to obliterate this neat distinction. For it is commonly assumed that ought (at least under normal circumstances) implies can. But if necessitarianism is true then I can only do what I actually do. Hence what I ought to do becomes limited to what I in fact do. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Can Natural Law Ethics be Tenable Today? Towards a Critical Natural Law Theory.Robert Deinhammer - 2021 - Heythrop Journal 62 (3):511-534.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Can Natural Law Ethics be Tenable Today? Towards a Critical Natural Law Theory.Robert Deinhammer - 2016 - Heythrop Journal 58 (4).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark