Switch to: References

Citations of:

Intelligence, race, and psychological testing

Mark Alfano, Latasha Holden & Andrew Conway

In Naomi Zack (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race. New York, USA: Oxford University Press USA (2017)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

g as bridge model.Devin Sanchez Curry - 2021 - Philosophy of Science 88 (5):1067-1078.details Psychometric g—a statistical factor capturing intercorrelations between scores on different IQ tests—is of theoretical interest despite being a low-fidelity model of both folk psychological intelligence and its cognitive/neural underpinnings. Psychometric g idealizes away from those aspects of cognitive/neural mechanisms that are not explanatory of the relevant variety of folk psychological intelligence, and it idealizes away from those varieties of folk psychological intelligence that are not generated by the relevant cognitive/neural substrate. In this manner, g constitutes a high-fidelity bridge model of (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 2 citations
Mind who’s testing: Turing tests and the post-colonial imposition of their implicit conceptions of intelligence.Fabian Fischbach, Tijs Vandemeulebroucke & Aimee van Wynsberghe - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-12.details This paper aims to show that dominant conceptions of intelligence used in artificial intelligence (AI) are biased by normative assumptions that originate from the Global North, making it questionable if AI can be uncritically applied elsewhere without risking serious harm to vulnerable people. After the introduction in Sect. 1 we shortly present the history of IQ testing in Sect. 2, focusing on its multiple discriminatory biases. To determine how these biases came into existence, we define intelligence ontologically and underline its (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation

1