Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data.Ann S. Zimmerman - 2008 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 33 (5):631-652.
    This article analyzes the experiences of ecologists who used data they did not collect themselves. Specifically, the author examines the processes by which ecologists understand and assess the quality of the data they reuse, and investigates the role that standard methods of data collection play in these processes. Standardization is one means by which scientific knowledge is transported from local to public spheres. While standards can be helpful, the results show that knowledge of the local context is critical to ecologists' (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Putting Sociology First—Reconsidering the Role of the Social in ‘Nature of Science’ Education.Gábor Á Zemplén - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (5):525-559.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Observing temporal order in living processes: on the role of time in embryology on the cell level in the 1870s and post-2000.Bettina Bock von Wülfingen - 2015 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37 (1):87-104.
    The article analyses the role of time in the visual culture of two phases in embryological research: at the end of the nineteenth century, and in the years around 2000. The first case study involves microscopical cytology, the second reproductive genetics. In the 1870s we observe the first of a series of abstractions in research methodology on conception and development, moving from a method propagated as the observation of the “real” living object to the production of stained and fixated objects (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Roles of Institutional Trust and Distrust in Grounding Rational Deference to Scientific Expertise.Frédéric Bouchard - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (5):582-608.
    Given the complexity of most phenomena, we have to delegate much epistemic work to other knowers and we must find reasons for relying on these specific knowers and not others. In our societies, these other knowers are often called experts and we rely on their epistemic authority more and more. For many complex phenomena such as climate change, genetically modified crops, and immunization, the experts that are called upon are scientific experts. For that reason, finding good reasons and justification for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Philosophy of Scientific Malpractice.Hanne Andersen - 2021 - SATS 22 (2):135-148.
    This paper presents current work in philosophy of science in practice that focusses on practices that are detrimental to the production of scientific knowledge. The paper argues that philosophy of scientific malpractice both provides an epistemological complement to research ethics in understanding scientific misconduct and questionable research practices, and provides a new approach to how training in responsible conduct of research can be implemented.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Should the sociology of science be rated X?Douglas Allchin - 2004 - Science Education 88 (6):934-946.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations