Switch to: References

Citations of:

Ethics of Decentralized Social Technologies: Lessons from Web3, the Fediverse, and Beyond

Danielle Allen, Woojin Lim, Eli Frankel, Joshua Simons, Divya Siddarth & Glen Weyl

Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics (2023)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

Open Problems in DAOs: Political Science and Philosophy.Eliza R. Oak, Woojin Lim, Danielle Allen & Helene Landemore - 2023 - Arxiv.details Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are a new, rapidly-growing class of organizations governed by smart contracts. Here we describe how researchers can contribute to the emerging science of DAOs and other digitally-constituted organizations. From granular privacy primitives to mechanism designs to model laws, we identify high-impact problems in the DAO ecosystem where existing gaps might be tackled through a new data set or by applying tools and ideas from existing research fields such as political science, computer science, economics, law, and organizational (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
A Roadmap for Governing AI: Technology Governance and Power-Sharing Liberalism.Danielle Allen, Woojin Lim, Sarah Hubbard, Allison Stanger, Shlomit Wagman, Kinney Zalesne & Omoaholo Omoakhalen - 2025 - AI and Ethics 4 (4).details This paper aims to provide a roadmap for governing AI. In contrast to the reigning paradigms, we argue that AI governance should be not merely a reactive, punitive, status-quo-defending enterprise, but rather the expression of an expansive, proactive vision for technology—to advance human flourishing. Advancing human flourishing in turn requires democratic/political stability and economic empowerment. To accomplish this, we build on a new normative framework that will give humanity its best chance to reap the full benefits, while avoiding the dangers, (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
Moral Learning in Organizations: An Integrative Framework for Organizational Ethics.Martin Kornberger & Stephan Leixnering - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-12.details Organizations face a plethora of moral challenges. To address these challenges, they must develop the capacity for moral action. Drawing on pragmatist philosophy and, more specifically, on the concept of moral imagination, we theorize such organizational capacity building as moral learning. We propose three conceptual building blocks, which together form the framework for moral learning. First, we posit that morality may be anchored in concrete action rather than in general rules or principles. In particular, we suggest that the locus of (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
A Roadmap for Governing AI: Technology Governance and Power Sharing Liberalism.Danielle Allen, Sarah Hubbard, Woojin Lim, Allison Stanger, Shlomit Wagman & Kinney Zalesne - 2024 - Harvard Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation.details This paper aims to provide a roadmap to AI governance. In contrast to the reigning paradigms, we argue that AI governance should not be merely a reactive, punitive, status-quo-defending enterprise, but rather the expression of an expansive, proactive vision for technology—to advance human flourishing. Advancing human flourishing in turn requires democratic/political stability and economic empowerment. Our overarching point is that answering questions of how we should govern this emerging technology is a chance not merely to categorize and manage narrow risk (...) Download Export citation Bookmark

1