Switch to: References

Citations of:

A critique of infinity: Rosenzweig and Levinas

Dudley, MA: Peeters (2006)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. „Nichts“ ir „Il y a“ problema kaip asmens tapatumo koreliatyvumas.Luc Anckaert - 2017 - Žmogus ir Žodis 19 (4).
    Dialogo filosofijos mąstytojų Rosenzweig‘o ir Levino darbų esmė – mirties bedugnės ir asmens tapatumo santykis. Rosenzweig‘as niekį laiko galutiniu kantiškojo mąstymo tašku. Mirtis, kaip egzistencinis niekio patyrimas, buvo laikoma kiekvieno žmogaus realybe sudėtingu amžių sandūros laikotarpiu. Rosenzweig‘ui niekis buvo atspirties taškas, permąstant ir siekiant išsaugoti asmens tapatumą. Asmens tapatumas apsaugo nuo niekio, tačiau jis taip pat yra atviras pokyčiams. Savo ankstyvuosiuose tekstuose Levinas daro panašias prielaidas, laikydamas Buvimą asmens tapatumo pradžia. Levinas plėtojo dialektinę fenomenologiją pradėdamas nuo mirties. Asmens tapatumas traktuojamas (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Levinas, recognition and judaism.Terence Holden - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82 (2):195-217.
    I seek to draw out the unique character of Levinas’ theory of recognition by highlighting its transitional character in a double sense. It is transitional, firstly, in that it stands between two models of recognition: the earlier agonistic model of Kojeve and the later model of Honneth which takes as its point of departure a primordial relation of mutual affirmation between individuals. It is transitional secondly in the sense that, while Levinas initially employs the concept of recognition, he is later (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Created Ego in Levinas' Totality and Infinity.April D. Capili - 2011 - Sophia 50 (4):677-692.
    There are two seemingly opposed descriptions of the subject in Totality and Infinity : the separate and autonomous I and the self that is ready to respond to the Other’s suffering and need. This paper points out that there is in fact another way Levinas speaks of the subject, which reinforces and reconciles the other two accounts. Throughout his first major work, Levinas explains how the ego is allowed to emerge as such by the Other who constantly confronts it. At (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation