Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ne Hic Saltaveris: The Marxian Theory of Exploitation After Roemer: Gilbert L. Skillman.Gilbert L. Skillman - 1995 - Economics and Philosophy 11 (2):309-331.
    In his book A General Theory of Exploitation and Class, John Roemer employs the tools of mainstream general equilibrium and game-theoretic analysis to develop a fundamental critique and broadbased reformulation of Marxian economic theory. Perhaps Roemer's most striking departure from traditional Marxian tenets lies in his explanation of the material basis of exploitation in capitalist economies. Roemer argues that capitalist exploitation must be understood as essentially the consequence of exchange given differential ownership of relatively scarce productive assets. In particular, Roemer (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Monadic marxism: A critique of Elster's methodological individualism.Douglas Moggach - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (1):38-63.
    Elster's work unstably combines Leibnizian and utilitarian conceptions of action and offers various deconstructions of rationality and individuality. His method ological individualism gives an inadequate account of its privileged object, individual teleologies, and a distorted account of the relational framework of social reproduction and transformation. Elster has not properly conceptualized the relation of the teleological act to patterns of material and social causality, and his rational choice theory proves unable to accommodate the interactions of his postulated monadic individuals. His most (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Roemer's “General” Theory of Exploitation Is a Special Case: The Limits of Walrasian Marxism.James Devine - 1991 - Economics and Philosophy 7 (2):235-275.
    In a series of recent writings, John Roemer has made a provocative claim: exploitation and class are merely second-order concepts within Marxian theory, because both phenomena derive directly from differential ownership of productive assets ; indeed, exploitation remains a consistent index of economic injustice only if a “property relations” conception of exploitation replaces the common “labor-value” view. In sum, property relations, not the labor exchange, the labor proces, labor values, or even capitalist accumlation should bethecentral concern of Marxian theory.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • How Marxism Is Analyzed: An Introduction.Robert Ware - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 15:1-26.
    What has come to be called ‘analytical Marxism’ is to be celebrated when properly understood. It is a phenomenon that has engaged some of the best people in philosophy, political science, economics, sociology, and other disciplines. In the last fifteen years there has been a blossoming of anaytic studies on Marx and on Marxism in the mainstreams of academic disciplines, with the first impetus coming from philosophers who had been working in the analytic tradition. During the previous sixty years of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Marxism and methodological individualism.Jutta Weldes - 1989 - Theory and Society 18 (3):353-386.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations