Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition.Dennis Norris & James M. McQueen - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (2):357-395.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  • The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition.James S. Magnuson, James A. Dixon, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (1):133-156.
    The sounds that make up spoken words are heard in a series and must be mapped rapidly onto words in memory because their elements, unlike those of visual words, cannot simultaneously exist or persist in time. Although theories agree that the dynamics of spoken word recognition are important, they differ in how they treat the nature of the competitor set—precisely which words are activated as an auditory word form unfolds in real time. This study used eye tracking to measure the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition.James S. Magnuson, James A. Dixon, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (1):133-156.
    The sounds that make up spoken words are heard in a series and must be mapped rapidly onto words in memory because their elements, unlike those of visual words, cannot simultaneously exist or persist in time. Although theories agree that the dynamics of spoken word recognition are important, they differ in how they treat the nature of the competitor set—precisely which words are activated as an auditory word form unfolds in real time. This study used eye tracking to measure the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • The rules versus similarity distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
    The distinction between rules and similarity is central to our understanding of much of cognitive psychology. Two aspects of existing research have motivated the present work. First, in different cognitive psychology areas we typically see different conceptions of rules and similarity; for example, rules in language appear to be of a different kind compared to rules in categorization. Second, rules processes are typically modeled as separate from similarity ones; for example, in a learning experiment, rules and similarity influences would be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Statistical learning of syllable sequences as trajectories through a perceptual similarity space.Wendy Qi & Jason D. Zevin - 2024 - Cognition 244 (C):105689.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Individual Differences in Categorization Gradience As Predicted by Online Processing of Phonetic Cues During Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements.Jinghua Ou, Alan C. L. Yu & Ming Xiang - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (3):e12948.
    Recent studies have documented substantial variability among typical listeners in how gradiently they categorize speech sounds, and this variability in categorization gradience may link to how listeners weight different cues in the incoming signal. The present study tested the relationship between categorization gradience and cue weighting across two sets of English contrasts, each varying orthogonally in two acoustic dimensions. Participants performed a four‐alternative forced‐choice identification task in a visual world paradigm while their eye movements were monitored. We found that (a) (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Statistical Learning of Unfamiliar Sounds as Trajectories Through a Perceptual Similarity Space.Felix Hao Wang, Elizabeth A. Hutton & Jason D. Zevin - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (8):e12740.
    In typical statistical learning studies, researchers define sequences in terms of the probability of the next item in the sequence given the current item (or items), and they show that high probability sequences are treated as more familiar than low probability sequences. Existing accounts of these phenomena all assume that participants represent statistical regularities more or less as they are defined by the experimenters—as sequential probabilities of symbols in a string. Here we offer an alternative, or possibly supplementary, hypothesis. Specifically, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • What Are You Waiting For? Real‐Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.Marcus E. Galle, Jamie Klein-Packard, Kayleen Schreiber & Bob McMurray - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (1):e12700.
    Speech unfolds over time, and the cues for even a single phoneme are rarely available simultaneously. Consequently, to recognize a single phoneme, listeners must integrate material over several hundred milliseconds. Prior work contrasts two accounts: (a) a memory buffer account in which listeners accumulate auditory information in memory and only access higher level representations (i.e., lexical representations) when sufficient information has arrived; and (b) an immediate integration scheme in which lexical representations can be partially activated on the basis of early (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis ten Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.Naomi H. Feldman, Thomas L. Griffiths & James L. Morgan - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):752-782.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Two types of thought: Evidence from aphasia.Jules Davidoff - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):20-21.
    Evidence from aphasia is considered that leads to a distinction between abstract and concrete thought processes and hence for a distinction between rules and similarity. It is argued that perceptual classification is inherently a rule-following procedure and these rules are unable to be followed when a patient has difficulty with name comprehension and retrieval.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.S. Apfelbaum Keith & McMurray Bob - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S4):706-747.
    Previous research on associative learning has uncovered detailed aspects of the process, including what types of things are learned, how they are learned, and where in the brain such learning occurs. However, perceptual processes, such as stimulus recognition and identification, take time to unfold. Previous studies of learning have not addressed when, during the course of these dynamic recognition processes, learned representations are formed and updated. If learned representations are formed and updated while recognition is ongoing, the result of learning (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Ambiguity, Competition, and Blending in Spoken Word Recognition.M. Gareth Gaskell & William D. Marslen-Wilson - 1999 - Cognitive Science 23 (4):439-462.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Early lexical influences on sublexical processing in speech perception: Evidence from electrophysiology.Colin Noe & Simon Fischer-Baum - 2020 - Cognition 197 (C):104162.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition.James S. Magnuson, James A. Dixon, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2007 - Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 30 (1):133-156.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What Are You Waiting For? Real‐Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.Marcus E. Galle, Jamie Klein-Packard, Kayleen Schreiber & Bob McMurray - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (1):e12700.
    Speech unfolds over time, and the cues for even a single phoneme are rarely available simultaneously. Consequently, to recognize a single phoneme, listeners must integrate material over several hundred milliseconds. Prior work contrasts two accounts: (a) a memory buffer account in which listeners accumulate auditory information in memory and only access higher level representations (i.e., lexical representations) when sufficient information has arrived; and (b) an immediate integration scheme in which lexical representations can be partially activated on the basis of early (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.Anne Pier Salverda, Delphine Dahan, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Katherine Crosswhite, Mikhail Masharov & Joyce McDonough - 2007 - Cognition 105 (2):466-476.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.Meghan Clayards, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Richard N. Aslin & Robert A. Jacobs - 2008 - Cognition 108 (3):804-809.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Distal rhythm influences whether or not listeners hear a word in continuous speech: Support for a perceptual grouping hypothesis.Tuuli H. Morrill, Laura C. Dilley, J. Devin McAuley & Mark A. Pitt - 2014 - Cognition 131 (1):69-74.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access.Sarah C. Creel, Richard N. Aslin & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2008 - Cognition 106 (2):633-664.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension.Anne Pier Salverda, Delphine Dahan & James M. McQueen - 2003 - Cognition 90 (1):51-89.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.Bob McMurray, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2002 - Cognition 86 (2):B33-B42.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: Enhancing development or an unintended consequence?Bob McMurray, Kristine A. Kovack-Lesh, Dresden Goodwin & William McEchron - 2013 - Cognition 129 (2):362-378.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.Robert A. Jacobs Meghan Clayards, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Richard N. Aslin - 2008 - Cognition 108 (3):804.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition.James S. Magnuson, James A. Dixon, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (1):133-156.
    The sounds that make up spoken words are heard in a series and must be mapped rapidly onto words in memory because their elements, unlike those of visual words, cannot simultaneously exist or persist in time. Although theories agree that the dynamics of spoken word recognition are important, they differ in how they treat the nature of the competitor set—precisely which words are activated as an auditory word form unfolds in real time. This study used eye tracking to measure the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations