Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Contrasting Medical and Legal Standards of Evidence: A Precision Medicine Case Study.Gary E. Marchant, Kathryn Scheckel & Doug Campos-Outcalt - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):194-204.
    As the health care system transitions to a precision medicine approach that tailors clinical care to the genetic profile of the individual patient, there is a potential tension between the clinical uptake of new technologies by providers and the legal system's expectation of the standard of care in applying such technologies. We examine this tension by comparing the type of evidence that physicians and courts are likely to rely on in determining a duty to recommend pharmacogenetic testing of patients prescribed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Wrongful Birth: Medical, Legal, and Philosophical Issues.Jeffrey R. Botkin & Maxwell J. Mehlman - 1994 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (1):21-28.
    “Wrongful birth” is a controversial malpractice action, which has arisen in the past two decades, secondary to an expanding knowledge of human genetics and the constitutionally protected access to abortion. Under the wrongful birth claim, parents of a child with a congenital illness or abnormality may bring suit against a physician who allegedly failed to provide appropriate prenatal counseling or information. Typically, the parents claim that they were inadequately warned of a potential problem in their child, and that this paucity (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations