Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Responsible nudging for social good: new healthcare skills for AI-driven digital personal assistants.Marianna Capasso & Steven Umbrello - 2022 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (1):11-22.
    Traditional medical practices and relationships are changing given the widespread adoption of AI-driven technologies across the various domains of health and healthcare. In many cases, these new technologies are not specific to the field of healthcare. Still, they are existent, ubiquitous, and commercially available systems upskilled to integrate these novel care practices. Given the widespread adoption, coupled with the dramatic changes in practices, new ethical and social issues emerge due to how these systems nudge users into making decisions and changing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Coercive public health policies need context-specific ethical justifications.Tess Johnson, Lerato Ndlovu, Omolara O. Baiyegunhi, Wezzie S. Lora & Nicola Desmond - forthcoming - Monash Bioethics Review:1-22.
    Public health policies designed to improve individual and population health may involve coercion. These coercive policies require ethical justification, and yet it is unclear in the public health ethics literature which ethical concepts might justify coercion, and what their limitations are in applying across contexts. In this paper, we analyse a number of concepts from Western bioethics, including the harm principle, paternalism, the public interest, and a duty of easy rescue. We find them plausible justifications for coercion in theory, but (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark