Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What Do Chimeras Think About?Benjamin Capps - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (4):496-514.
    Non-human animal chimeras, containing human neurological cells, have been created in the laboratory. Despite a great deal of debate, the status of such beings has not been resolved. Under normal definitions, such a being could either be unconventionally human or abnormally animal. Practical investigations in animal sentience, artificial intelligence, and now chimera research, suggest that such beings may be assumed to have no legal rights, so philosophy could provide a different answer. In this vein, therefore, we can ask: What would (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Asking the Right Questions about Research with Nonhuman Primates.Gardar Arnason, Sara Tinnemeyer & Jens Clausen - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (3):189-191.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cerebral Organoid Research Ethics and Pinning the Tail on the Donkey.Alex McKeown - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (4):542-554.
    The risk of creating cerebral organoids/assembloids conscious enough to suffer is a recurrent concern in organoid research ethics. On one hand, we should, apparently, avoid discovering how to distinguish between organoids that it would be permissible (non-conscious) and impermissible (conscious) to use in research, since if successful we would create organoids that suffer. On the other, if we do not, the risk persists that research might inadvertently continue to cause organoids to suffer. Moreover, since modeling some brain disorders may require (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Animal Research that Respects Animal Rights: Extending Requirements for Research with Humans to Animals.Angela K. Martin - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):59-72.
    The purpose of this article is to show that animal rights are not necessarily at odds with the use of animals for research. If animals hold basic moral rights similar to those of humans, then we should consequently extend the ethical requirements guiding research with humans to research with animals. The article spells out how this can be done in practice by applying the seven requirements for ethical research with humans proposed by Ezekiel Emanuel, David Wendler and Christine Grady to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations