Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Transdisciplinarity as a Nonimperial Encounter: for an Open Sociology.Steinmetz George - 2007 - Thesis Eleven 91 (1):48-65.
    In this article I argue for a transdisciplinary approach to the human or social sciences. There is little ontological or epistemological justification for a division among these disciplines. I recommend that sociology stop worrying about policing its disciplinary boundaries and begin to encourage various forms of intellectual transculturation. I then analyze barriers to transdisciplinarity by comparing disciplines to states and comparing the relations among disciplines to different sorts of imperial practice, or interstate relations. The most common interdisciplinary strategies are analogous (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Russia against Europe: A clash of interpretations of modernity?Mikhail Maslovskiy - 2019 - European Journal of Social Theory 22 (4):533-547.
    This article argues that combining elements of the sociological theories of Johann Arnason and Peter Wagner can contribute to an understanding of the causes of the ‘new Cold War’ on the European continent. Comparisons of today’s confrontation between Russia and the West with the original Cold War are largely misleading since the Soviet model of modernity represented a radical alternative to its liberal western version. Unlike the original Cold War, the current ideological confrontation is not connected with a clash of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Contingency and modernity in the thought of J.P. Arnason.Wolfgang Knöbl - 2011 - European Journal of Social Theory 14 (1):9-22.
    This article argues that Arnason’s writings succeed in pushing civilizational analysis — most prominently developed by the late Shmuel N. Eisenstadt — in a much-needed direction. Coming from an action-theoretical background in which the creativity of actors is strongly emphasized, Arnason is critical of approaches within civilizational analysis that tend to downplay contingency within historical processes. Especially by focusing on the role of political power and imperial encounters, Arnason demonstrates how civilizational analysis can be further developed in ways that do (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation