Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Logical Construction of Value-Theory: More on Fine and Saad-Filho.Jim Kincaid - 2009 - Historical Materialism 17 (3):208-220.
    Fine and Saad-Filho are wrong to insist that an abstract category of production should be the starting point of Marxist value-theory in logical, temporal and causal terms. Marx, in Capital, begins with a repertoire of simpler categories and slowly constructs the complex category of capitalist production. It is vital that exploitation should be seen as one phase of a process of capital-in-motion, and due weight given to money, competition and realisation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Production versus Capital in Motion: A Reply to Fine and Saad-Filho.Jim Kincaid - 2008 - Historical Materialism 16 (4):181-203.
    A further critique of Fine and Saad-Filho's reading of Marxist political economy: it neglects the monetary dimension of Marx's analysis; it focuses too much on production, and on the organic composition of capital, treated in isolation from the overall circuit of capital. An alternative theorisation is proposed, stressing what will now be called emergence patterns in Marx's value theory, and giving due weight to circulation, realisation, competition and capital allocation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Editorial Introduction.Jim Kincaid - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (2):27-40.
    I survey some important semantical and axiomatic theories of self-referential truth. Kripke's fixed-point theory, the revision theory of truth and appraoches involving fuzzy logic are the main examples of semantical theories. I look at axiomatic theories devised by Cantini, Feferman, Freidman and Sheard. Finally some applications of the theory of self-referential truth are considered.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation