Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Facts-well-put.Davis Baird & Alfred Nordmann - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):37-77.
    In this paper we elucidate a particular type of instrument. Striking-phenomenon instruments assume their striking profile against the shifting backdrop of theoretical uncertainties. While technologically stable, the phenomena produced by these instruments are linguistically fuzzy, subject to a variety of conceptual representations. But in virtue of their technological stability alone, they can provide a foundation for further technological as well as conceptual development. Sometimes, as in the case of the pulse glass, the phenomenon is taken to confirm conflicting theoretical views; (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Vision, body and interpretation in medical imaging diagnostics.Renzhen Chen & Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis - 2024 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 27 (2):253-266.
    This article explores the profound impact of visualism and visual perception in the context of medical imaging diagnostics. It emphasizes the intricate interplay among vision, embodiment, subjectivity, language, and historicity within the realm of medical science and technology, with a specific focus on image consciousness. The study delves into the role of subjectivity in perception, facilitating the communication of opacity and historicity to the perceiving individual. Additionally, it scrutinizes the image interpretation process, drawing parallels to text interpretation and highlighting the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Science, realization and reality: The fundamental issues.Hans Radder - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (3):327-349.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Factive inferentialism and the puzzle of model-based explanation.Philippe Verreault-Julien - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):10039-10057.
    Highly idealized models may serve various epistemic functions, notably explanation, in virtue of representing the world. Inferentialism provides a prima facie compelling characterization of what constitutes the representation relation. In this paper, I argue that what I call factive inferentialism does not provide a satisfactory solution to the puzzle of model-based—factive—explanation. In particular, I show that making explanatory counterfactual inferences is not a sufficient guide for accurate representation, factivity, or realism. I conclude by calling for a more explicit specification of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark