Switch to: References

Citations of:

A New Querelle of Universals

Philosophy Today 61 (4):929-945 (2017)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Modern European Philosophy.Lucie Mercier & George Tomlinson - 2018 - The Year's Work in Critical and Cultural Theory 26 (1):346-367.
    This chapter reviews three of the most consequential works in modern European philosophy published in 2017: Étienne Balibar’s Citizen Subject, Nick Nesbitt’s edited volume The Concept in Crisis, and William Clare Roberts’s Marx’s Inferno. These works reflect the fact that 2017 witnessed an upsurge of philosophical publications on Marx and Marxism. On one level, this is because 2017 was simultaneously the 150-year anniversary of the publication of the first volume of Marx’s Capital and the 100-year anniversary of the Russian Revolution. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Étienne Balibar on the dialectic of universal citizenship.Christiaan Boonen - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (6):904-933.
    Philosophy & Social Criticism, Volume 48, Issue 6, Page 904-933, July 2022. In this article, I reconstruct Étienne Balibar’s work against the background of the debate on modern universal citizenship. I argue that universal citizenship is neither fundamentally emancipatory nor fundamentally oppressive but is rather both. In order to defend this position, I build on Balibar’s concept of the “citizen subject.” First, I parse this concept, showing how it allows us to think about the contradictions of modern universal citizenship. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Étienne Balibar on the dialectic of universal citizenship.Christiaan Boonen - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (6):904-933.
    In this article, I reconstruct Étienne Balibar’s work against the background of the debate on modern universal citizenship. I argue that universal citizenship is neither fundamentally emancipatory nor fundamentally oppressive but is rather both. In order to defend this position, I build on Balibar’s concept of the “citizen subject.” First, I parse this concept, showing how it allows us to think about the contradictions of modern universal citizenship. In the second section, I elucidate its temporal logic and show how it (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations