Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Specialization Effect and Its Influence on Memory and Problem Solving in Expert Chess Players.Merim Bilalić, Peter McLeod & Fernand Gobet - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (6):1117-1143.
    Expert chess players, specialized in different openings, recalled positions and solved problems within and outside their area of specialization. While their general expertise was at a similar level, players performed better with stimuli from their area of specialization. The effect of specialization on both recall and problem solving was strong enough to override general expertise—players remembering positions and solving problems from their area of specialization performed at around the level of players 1 standard deviation (SD) above them in general skill. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Cognitivism or Situated-Distributed Cognition? Assessing Kashmiri Carpet Weaving Practice from the Two Theoretical Paradigms.Gagan Deep Kaur - 2019 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11 (4):917-937.
    Cognition is predominantly seen as information processing in multidisciplinary landscape of cognition studies, despite having had a formidable opposition from embodied and embedded perspectives in the last few decades. This paper analyses cognitive processes involved in different task domains of Kashmiri carpet weaving practice from the theoretical frameworks of cognitivism and situated-distributed cognition. After introducing the practice and its task domains (Section −1), paradigmatic cognitive activities involved in them are discussed and how these are explained by the two theoretical paradigms (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The importance of iteration in creative conceptual combination.Joel Chan & Christian D. Schunn - 2015 - Cognition 145:104-115.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Role of Functionality in the Mental Representations of Engineering Students: Some Differences in the Early Stages of Expertise.Jarrod Moss, Kenneth Kotovsky & Jonathan Cagan - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (1):65-93.
    As engineers gain experience and become experts in their domain, the structure and content of their knowledge changes. Two studies are presented that examine differences in knowledge representation among freshman and senior engineering students. The first study examines recall of mechanical devices and chunking of components, and the second examines whether seniors represent devices in a more abstract functional manner than do freshmen. The most prominent differences between these 2 groups involve their representation of the functioning of groups of electromechanical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Impact of Analogies on Creative Concept Generation: Lessons From an In Vivo Study in Engineering Design.Joel Chan & Christian Schunn - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (1):126-155.
    Research on innovation often highlights analogies from sources outside the current problem domain as a major source of novel concepts; however, the mechanisms underlying this relationship are not well understood. We analyzed the temporal interplay between far analogy use and creative concept generation in a professional design team's brainstorming conversations, investigating the hypothesis that far analogies lead directly to very novel concepts via large steps in conceptual spaces . Surprisingly, we found that concepts were more similar to their preceding concepts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Role of Functionality in the Mental Representations of Engineering Students: Some Differences in the Early Stages of Expertise.Jarrod Moss, Kenneth Kotovsky & Jonathan Cagan - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (1):65-93.
    As engineers gain experience and become experts in their domain, the structure and content of their knowledge changes. Two studies are presented that examine differences in knowledge representation among freshman and senior engineering students. The first study examines recall of mechanical devices and chunking of components, and the second examines whether seniors represent devices in a more abstract functional manner than do freshmen. The most prominent differences between these 2 groups involve their representation of the functioning of groups of electromechanical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark