Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Kan God een goede verklaring zijn? Over theïstische verklaringen in de wetenschap.Jeroen de Ridder - 2008 - Philosophia Reformata 73 (1):44-60.
    Veel wetenschappers, filosofen en theologen zijn van mening dat God nooit opgevoerd mag worden als verklaring voor een verschijnsel. Eén argument dat ze hiervoor aandragen is dat het op de een of andere manier in de aard van wetenschap zit dat God er geen rol in kan spelen. In dit artikel ga ik in op een specifieke versie van dit argument. Ik vraag me af of de aard van wetenschappelijke verklaringen uitsluit dat God als verklaringsgrond wordt genoemd. Om die vraag (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Science and Religion: Philosophical Issues.Alan G. Padgett - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (1):222-230.
    An overview of several philosophical issues that arise from the recent growth of interest in the relationships between science (especially natural science) and theology (especially Christian thought). The interactions between theology and science are complex, and often highly contextual in nature. This makes simple typologies of their interaction rather dubious. There are some similarities between religion and science, including the difficulty of defining them. Concerns about the use and meaning of language, and issues of realism and anti‐realism, are found in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Science and God the creator.Arthur Peacocke - 1993 - Zygon 28 (4):469-484.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)The pluralist predicament in studies of religion.Peter Hobson & John Edwards - 1997 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 29 (2):33–50.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Experience and explanation: The justification of cognitive claims in theology.Wentzel Huyssteen - 1988 - Zygon 23 (3):247-260.
    The justification of cognitive claims in theology can be dealt with adequately only if the epistemological issues of metaphorical reference, experiential adequacy, and explanatory progress are seen as crucial problems for the more encompassing problem of rationality in theology. In order to guarantee any claim to reality depiction the theologian will have to argue for a plausible theory of reference on the basis of interpreted religious experience. In this discussion important analogies between the rationality of theological theorizing and the rationality (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations