Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Conceptualising humiliation.Maartje Elshout, Rob M. A. Nelissen & Ilja van Beest - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (8):1581-1594.
    ABSTRACTHumiliation lacks an empirically derived definition, sometimes simply being equated with shame. We approached the conceptualisation of humiliation from a prototype perspective, identifying 61 features of humiliation, some of which are more central to humiliation than others. Prototypical humiliation involved feeling powerless, small, and inferior in a situation in which one was brought down and in which an audience was present, leading the person to appraise the situation as unfair and resulting in a mix of emotions, most notably disappointment, anger, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Revenge is sweet.Joshua Gert - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (4):971-986.
    The first half of this paper defends the claim revenge is a personal good. That is, it is the sort of thing, the pursuit of which, for oneself, always provides a reason for action. This makes trouble for the dominant philosophical view of the relation between morality and practical reason: a view held by theorists we can call ‘Angels’. Angels hold that moral requirements are also rational requirements. Devils, on the other hand, hold that immoral behavior is at least sometimes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Vengeance is self-focused: Comparing vengeful to anger-driven responses.Maartje Elshout, Rob M. A. Nelissen & Ilja van Beest - 2015 - Cognition and Emotion 29 (7):1239-1255.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Benevolence and resentment.Wendell Stephenson - 1989 - Theoria 55 (1):45-61.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Anger, Feelings of Revenge, and Hate.Janne van Doorn - 2018 - Emotion Review 10 (4):321-322.
    In the current comment, I discuss what is unique about hate in relation to anger and feelings of revenge. It seems that hate can be distinguished from the related emotions anger and feelings of revenge by a difference in focus: Anger focuses on changing/restoring the unjust situation caused by another person, feelings of revenge focus on restoring the self, and hatred focuses on eliminating the hated person/group. Though grounded in existing literature, future research is needed to empirically confirm the unique (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Economic analysis, common-sense morality and utilitarianism.J. Moreh - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (1):115 - 143.
    Economic concepts and methods are used to throw light on some aspects of common-sense ethics and the difference between it and Utilitarianism. (1) Very few exceptions are allowed to the rules of common-sense ethics, because of the cost of information required to justify an exception to Conscience and to other people. No such stringency characterizes Utilitarianism, an abstract system constructed by philosophers. (2) Rule Utilitarianism is neither consistent with common-sense ethics, nor does it maximize utility as has been claimed for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Keeping the Moral Score.David Heyd - 2018 - Criminal Justice Ethics 37 (2):189-200.
    I would strike you, were I not angry1Love and generosity are by their nature boundless, free from calculation. However, much of human interaction and particularly relations of justice are based on...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark