Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Two Sides of the Coin: Lack of Academic Integrity in Exams During the Corona Pandemic, Students' and Lecturers' Perceptions.Meital Amzalag, Noa Shapira & Niva Dolev - 2022 - Journal of Academic Ethics 20 (2):243-263.
    The Covid-19 pandemic that entered our lives suddenly in 2020 compelled higher education systems throughout the world to transfer to online learning, including online evaluation. A severe problem of online evaluation is that it enables various technological possibilities that facilitate students' unethical behaviors. The research aimed to investigate these behaviors, as well as the reasons for their appearance, as practiced in exams held for the first time during the Covid-19 pandemic, and to elicit students' and lecturers' perceptions of students' academic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Modeling and analysis of barriers to ethics in online assessment by TISM and fuzzy MICMAC analysis.Adya Sharma, Nehajoan Panackal & Sonica Rautela - 2022 - Asian Journal of Business Ethics 11 (1):111-138.
    The pandemic of COVID-19 has altered the world canvas forever. The education sector, too, has been impacted by the same. There has been a phenomenal rise in e-platforms for teaching, learning, and evaluation. Teachers and students had to train themselves overnight to embrace the changing dynamics of the education sector. The change has been marked with challenges. In this new education landscape, online exams have occupied center stage. While the idea of giving exams from any part of the world welcomes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Managing the mutations: academic misconduct Australia, New Zealand, and the UK.Stephen Tee, Steph Allen, Jane Mills & Melanie Birks - 2020 - International Journal for Educational Integrity 16 (1).
    Academic misconduct is a problem of growing concern across the tertiary education sector. While plagiarism has been the most common form of academic misconduct, the advent of software programs to detect plagiarism has seen the problem of misconduct simply mutate. As universities attempt to function in an increasingly complex environment, the factors that contribute to academic misconduct are unlikely to be easily mitigated. A multiple case study approach examined how academic misconduct is perceived in universities in in Australia, New Zealand (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The Effects of Peer Influence, Honor Codes, and Personality Traits on Cheating Behavior in a University Setting.Alvin Malesky, Cathy Grist, Kendall Poovey & Nicole Dennis - 2022 - Ethics and Behavior 32 (1):12-21.
    ABSTRACT Most university students have engaged in some form of academic dishonesty. These actions can have detrimental consequences for the student, the university, and society at large. It is important to understand factors that contribute to academic dishonesty as well as to identify potential predictors of this behavior. This study employed an experimental design with 361 undergraduate students in a laboratory setting. Deception was used during the experiment to determine the impact of peer influence, personality, and an honor code on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations