Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Significance of Mobility in Alfred Schutz’s Theory of Action.Simon Lafontaine - 2020 - Human Studies 43 (4):567-584.
    Mobility has become a central topic of contemporary social research with the mobility turn initiated in the 2000s. In order to grasp the complexity of the global order, its authors have attempted to decenter the importance of human subjectivity and to envisage a “sociology beyond societies”. The present paper considers this interpretive context to demonstrate the contemporary relevance of Alfred Schutz’s theory of action, and to propose a notion of mobility intrinsically linked to the performance of subjectivity. By revisiting the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Typification in Society and Social Science: The Continuing Relevance of Schutz’s Social Phenomenology. [REVIEW]Kwang-ki Kim & Tim Berard - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (3):263 - 289.
    This paper examines Alfred Schutz’s insights on types and typification. Beginning with a brief overview of the history and meaning of typification in interpretive sociology, the paper further addresses both the ubiquity and the necessity of typification in social life and scientific method. Schutz’s contribution itself is lacking in empirical application and grounding, but examples are provided of ongoing empirical research which advances the understanding of types and typification. As is suggested by illustrations from scholarship in the social studies of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Typification in Society and Social Science: The Continuing Relevance of Schutz’s Social Phenomenology.Kwang-ki Kim & Tim Berard - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (3):263-289.
    This paper examines Alfred Schutz’s insights on types and typification. Beginning with a brief overview of the history and meaning of typification in interpretive sociology, the paper further addresses both the ubiquity and the necessity of typification in social life and scientific method. Schutz’s contribution itself is lacking in empirical application and grounding, but examples are provided of ongoing empirical research which advances the understanding of types and typification. As is suggested by illustrations from scholarship in the social studies of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations