Switch to: References

Citations of:

Civil religion: a dialogue in the history of political philosophy

New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (2010)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hobbes and Spinoza on Sovereign Education.Boleslaw Z. Kabala & Thomas Cook - 2022 - Philosophies 7 (1):6.
    Most comparisons of Thomas Hobbes and Baruch Spinoza focus on the difference in understanding of natural right. We argue that Hobbes also places more weight on a rudimentary and exclusive education of the public by the state. We show that the difference is related to deeper disagreements over the prospect of Enlightenment. Hobbes is more sanguine than Spinoza about using the state to make people rational. Spinoza considers misguided an overemphasis on publicly educating everyone out of superstition—public education is important, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Das Abendland: The politics of Europe’s religious borders.Bryan S. Turner & Rosario Forlenza - 2019 - Critical Research on Religion 7 (1):6-23.
    The religious borders of Europe, which are more evident and controversial than ever, challenge established forms of political legitimacy and the legal requirements for citizenship. Perhaps covertly rather than overtly, they shape politics and policies. While scholars have once again resorted to Edward Said’s Orientalism to describe the dynamic at play, this article argues that the Orientalism narrative of East and West is too simple to capture the actual complexity of Europe’s borders. There are four religious and thus four cultural-symbolic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Machiavelli’s legacy: The Prince after 500 years.Mauricio Suchowlansky - 2017 - Contemporary Political Theory 16 (2):286-289.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Fantasies of Sovereignty: Civic Secularism in Canada.Pamela E. Klassen - 2015 - Critical Research on Religion 3 (1):41-56.
    To ask whether the postcolonial is postsecular demands asking for whom, where, and when? To that end, what follows is a reflection situated in two Canadian contexts, separated by time and place, but both connected to the ‘colonial secular’. Engaged in the public deliberation and storytelling of civic secularism, through which political legitimacy is achieved through comparing religions, these two contexts are twenty-first century Québec and early-twentieth-century British Columbia. More specifically, I consider two moments in which the state exerted its (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark