Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Berkeley, Theology, and Bible Scholarship.Daniele Bertini - 2010 - In Silvia Perigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer.
    My paper concerns Berkeley’s notion of theology. After brief considerations on the general attitude toward religion by Berkeley, I try to assess the immaterialistic approach to three main topics of theology: the ground of any theological knowledge, natural theology, revealed theology. My argument takes in consideration particularly Berkeley’s criticism of Scholasticism. My claim is the following: Berkeley holds that all men have an immediate experience of God’s presence, but this experience is not direct conceptual knowledge. I shortly compare my views (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Notas acerca do conceito neoplatónico de luz.Tomás N. Castro - 2018 - In História Antiga: Relações Interdisciplinares. Fontes, Artes, Filosofia, Política, Religião e Receção. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. pp. 331-343.
    In the resolution proclaiming 2015 the International Year of Light and Light-based Technologies, the General Assembly of the United Nations drew atten- tion to the importance of light in the lives of the citizens of the world. This is of major importance, not only because light plays a crucial role in fields as diverse as arts, culture or technology, but also because ‘light’ is a major concept within the history of philosophy. Since the first Presocratic philosophers, light had an important (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Historical Antecedents of Platonism: The Role of the Presocratics According to the Neoplatonists.Anna Motta - 2014 - Peitho 5 (1):43-58.
    One of the aims of the Neoplatonists is to demonstrate that ancient Presocratic thought is, in fact, a Preplatonic thought. According to the Neoplatonists, Presocratics, who were not far from the truth, employed an inaccurate and ambiguous language, whereas Plato spoke about the truth in a more appropriate and clear way. That is why the Presocratics are not necessarily erroneous and their theoretical originality and their terminology can be incorporated into the Neoplatonic philosophy. I would like to show how some (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Toward a Critique of Walten: Heidegger, Derrida, and Henological Difference.Adam Knowles - 2013 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 27 (3):265-276.
    Thus Plotinus (what is his status in the history of metaphysics and in the "Platonic" era, if one follows Heidegger's reading?), who speaks of presence, that is, also of morphē, as the trace of nonpresence, as the amorphous (to gar ikhnos tou amorphous morphē). A trace which is neither absence nor presence, nor, in whatever modality, a secondary modality.In his reading of Heidegger in his 2003 seminar, published as The Beast and the Sovereign, Derrida is particularly troubled by one particular (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Colloquium 1: Image and Analogy in Plotinus.Andrew Smith - 2012 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 27 (1):1-27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Introduction à l'histoire du concept de réflexion : position d'une recherche et matériaux bibliographiques.Robert Hébert - 1975 - Philosophiques 2 (1):131-153.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation