Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. New Light on Peirce's Conceptions of Retroduction, Deduction, and Scientific Reasoning.Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Francesco Bellucci - 2014 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (4):353-373.
    We examine Charles S. Peirce's mature views on the logic of science, especially as contained in his later and still mostly unpublished writings. We focus on two main issues. The first concerns Peirce's late conception of retroduction. Peirce conceived inquiry as performed in three stages, which correspond to three classes of inferences: abduction or retroduction, deduction, and induction. The question of the logical form of retroduction, of its logical justification, and of its methodology stands out as the three major threads (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • Schematic Enough to be Safe from Kidnappers: The Semiotics of Charles Peirce as Transitionalist Pragmatism.Alin Olteanu - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 53 (4):788-806.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Analysis and decomposition in Peirce.Francesco Bellucci - 2018 - Synthese 198 (1):687-706.
    Peirce seems to maintain two incompatible theses: that a sentence is multiply analyzable into subject and predicate, and that a sentence is uniquely analyzable as a combination of rhemata of first intention and rhemata of second intention. In this paper it is argued that the incompatibility disappears as soon as we distinguish, following Dummett’s work on Frege, two distinct notions of analysis: ‘analysis’ proper, whose purpose is to display the manner in which the sense of a sentence is determined by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Peirce and the Unity of the Proposition.Francesco Bellucci - 2014 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50 (2):201.
    The problem of the unity of the proposition—what distinguishes a proposition from a mere list of constituents, so that the former is able to say something while the latter is not?—is as old as philosophy. It is evoked at the end of Plato’s Sophist, where the Stranger affirms that when one makes a statement “he does not merely give names, but he reaches a conclusion by combining verbs with nouns” ; and it is discussed by Aristotle in De Interpretatione, where (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Charles S. Peirce and the Medieval Doctrine of consequentiae.Francesco Bellucci - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (3):244-268.
    In 1898 C. S. Peirce declares that the medieval doctrine of consequences had been the starting point of his logical investigations in the 1860s. This paper shows that Peirce studied the scholastic theory of consequentiae as early as 1866–67, that he adopted the scholastics’ terminology, and that that theory constituted a source of logical doctrine that sustained Peirce for a lifetime of creative and original work.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations