Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The shape of life: how much is written in stone? [REVIEW]Matthew A. Wills & Richard A. Fortey - 2000 - Bioessays 22 (12):1142-1152.
    Considering the enormous diversity of living organisms, representing mostly untapped resources for studying ecological, ontogenetic and phylogenetic patterns and processes, why should evolutionary biologists concern themselves with the remains of animals and plants that died out tens or even hundreds of millions of years ago? The reason is that important new insights into some of the most vexing evolutionary questions are being revealed at the interfaces of palaeontology, developmental biology and molecular biology. Attempts to synthesise information from these disciplines, however, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies.Davide Pisani, Michael J. Benton & Mark Wilkinson - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (3):269-281.
    When phylogenetic trees constructed from morphological and molecular evidence disagree (i.e. are incongruent) it has been suggested that the differences are spurious or that the molecular results should be preferred a priori. Comparing trees can increase confidence (congruence), or demonstrate that at least one tree is incorrect (incongruence). Statistical analyses of 181 molecular and 49 morphological trees shows that incongruence is greater between than within the morphological and molecular partitions, and this difference is significant for the molecular partition. Because the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark