Switch to: References

Citations of:

Global Health: Data, Definitions and Deliberations

In Solomon Benatar & Gillian Brock (eds.), Global Health and Global Health Ethics. Cambridge University Press (2011)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Global Health, Vulnerable Populations, and Law.Solomon R. Benatar - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):42-47.
    The most common response to the challenge of protecting health through law is to focus on protecting the rights of vulnerable individuals and to enhance their access to health care. Each one of us is vulnerable or potentially vulnerable because of the fragile, existential nature of the human condition. Catastrophic and unexpected events could instantaneously transform us from a state of total independence and potential vulnerability to one of extreme vulnerability and complete dependence. Some legal provisions have the potential to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Defining “Global Health Ethics”: Offering a Research Agenda for More Bioethics and Multidisciplinary Contributions—From the Global South and Beyond the Health Sciences—to Enrich Global Health and Global Health Ethics Initiatives.Catherine Myser - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (1):5-10.
    Some claim that “global health is public health” but most regard global health as a new field, rapidly emerging mostly at North American academic institutions . The term was first incorporated into University of California, San Francisco’s Institute for Global Health in 1999 and UCSF also inaugurated the first North American master of science in global health in 2009. Global health is commonly acknowledged to have historical precedents in tropical medicine and international health. All three fields are regarded as having (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Animals on Drugs: Understanding the Role of Pharmaceutical Companies in the Animal-Industrial Complex. [REVIEW]Richard Twine - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):505-514.
    In this paper I revisit previous critiques that I have made of much, though by no means all, bioethical discourse. These pertain to faithfulness to dualistic ontology, a taken-for-granted normative anthropocentrism, and the exclusion of a consideration of how political economy shapes the conditions for bioethical discourse (Twine Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8(3):285-295, 2005; International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 16(3):1-18, 2007, 2010). Part of my argument around bioethical dualist ontology is to critique the assumption of a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations