Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hume on the Ordinary Distinction Between Objective and Subjective Impressions.R. Jo Kornegay - 1993 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):241-269.
    Hume begins ‘Of scepticism with regard to the senses,’ Section 2 of the Treatise, Book I, Part iv with the claim that it is otiose to ask whether or not there are bodies since belief in their existence is unavoidable. The appropriate question is rather ‘What causes induce us to believe in the existence of body?’ (§2, 187-8; his emphasis). For Hume, belief is lively conception. Hence, he is also undertaking to answer the logically prior question: What causes induce us (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Locke on Language.E. J. Ashworth - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):45 - 73.
    Locke's main semantic thesis is that words stand for, or signify, ideas. He says this over and over again, though the phraseology he employs varies. In Book III chapter 2 alone we find the following statements of the thesis: ‘ … Words … come to be made use of by Men, as the Signs of their Ideas’ [III.2.1; 405:10-11); The use then of Words, is to be sensible Marks of Ideas; and the Ideas they stand for, are their proper and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology.Daniel E. Flage - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):25-60.
    Berkeley’s Principles is a curious work. The nominal topic is epistemic. The actual topic is ontological. And it is not uncommon to suggest that ‘Berkeley’s system presents us with unique puzzles, particularly at its foundation.’.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Cartesian Method of Locke's Essay concerning Human Understanding.P. A. Schouls - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):579 - 601.
    Locke tells us that his purpose in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding is “to inquire into the original, certainty, and extent of human knowledge, together with the grounds and degrees of belief, opinion, and assent”. He provides a characterization of general human knowledge as universal truths in propositional form. In doing this he presupposes a striking doctrine about the “extent” of man's general knowledge, and he draws freely upon a theory meant to explain both the materials out of which this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Hume et la fin de la philosophie Yves Michaud Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France, 1983. 288 p. [REVIEW]Denis Sauvé - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (1):183.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is Gerwin's Natural-Agency Theory a Viable Alternative to Hume?Andrew Ward - 1994 - Dialogue 33 (4):733-.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations