Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Harm or protection? Two-sided consequences of females' susceptible responses to multiple threats.Jingyuan Lin, Pim Cuijpers, Hong Li & Yi Lei - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.
    The target article presented a plausible argument that females' susceptibility to threats might be self-protection for staying alive, but some evidence requires scrutiny. We need to consider the biases of narrative reviews, subjective life quality, and the shadow side of extreme reactions to threats before concluding that females' threat-based response is a self-protection mechanism that promotes survival.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Staying alive enhances both women's and men's fitness.Renée V. Hagen, Delaney A. Knorr, Sally Li, Ashley Mensing & Brooke A. Scelza - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.
    We argue that Benenson et al. need to consider not only sex differences in the effects of care on offspring survival but also in age-specific fertility when predicting how longevity affects fitness. We review evidence that staying alive has important effects on both women's and men's fitness, and encourage consideration of alternative explanations for observed sex differences in threat responses.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The pregnancy compensation hypothesis, not the staying alive theory, accounts for disparate autoimmune functioning of women around the world.Erin M. O'Mara Kunz, Jackson A. Goodnight & Melissa A. Wilson - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.
    The pregnancy compensation hypothesis provides a mechanistic explanation for the evolution of sex differences in immune system functioning, the excess of women experiencing autoimmune disease, and why this is observed only in industrialized nations; none of which can be explained by the staying alive theory, as proposed by the authors of the target article.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Toward a more domain-specific conceptualization of female traits: A commentary on Benenson et al.Courtney L. Crosby, Rebecka K. Hahnel-Peeters & David M. Buss - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.
    Benenson et al. amass impressive evidence of robust sex differences as support for expanding “staying alive” theory. We argue for a broader and more domain-specific conceptualization focusing on life history tradeoffs between survival and mating success. Using three examples – women's disgust, fear of rape, and cultivation of bodyguards – we illustrate these tradeoffs and suggest a broader theoretical framework.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Staying alive includes adaptations for catalyzing cooperation.Alessandra Cassar - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.
    The target article interprets women's lower competitiveness than men's as evidence of adaptation to help women avoid physical conflicts and stay alive. This commentary advances the additional hypothesis that strategically suppressing competitiveness, thus signaling egalitarian intentions, could be an adaptation to catalyze cooperative behavior from males and females, turning natural competitors into allies and men into supportive partners.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pathological complexity and the evolution of sex differences.Walter Veit & Heather Browning - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e149.
    Benenson et al. provide a compelling case for treating greater investment into self-protection among females as an adaptive strategy. Here, we wish to expand their proposed adaptive explanation by placing it squarely in modern state-based and behavioural life-history theory, drawing on Veit'spathological complexityframework. This allows us to make sense of alternative “lifestyle” strategies, rather than pathologizing them.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations