Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 55-57.

Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 57-59.

Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 62-64.

Berger (2019) argues effectively that “representativeness is more aptly understood as a variable that is multidimensional and continuous based on relational moral authority,” and also makes some useful suggestions about how taking this observation seriously might require changes in current patterns of practice regarding surrogates. But the essay raises additional important questions about how the Best Interest Standard (BIS) should be used among unrepresented patients and other patients as well because many surrogates besides those who “have no actionable knowledge of (...) a patient’s preferences” find themselves in positions in which they need to determine, with the physician, what is in the patient’s best interests. In this commentary, we therefore provide support for the ethical superiority of BIS judgments made by a multi-stakeholder process (rather than solo decision-makers), and sketch a process by which such judgments might be made. (shrink)

Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 66-68.

Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 64-66.

Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 51-53.