Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Nietzsche and the premodernist critique of postmodernity.Michael Allen Gillespie - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (4):537-554.
    The crisis of modern reason culminates in Nietzsche's proclamation of nihilism. Drawing upon Nietzsche, postmodernists suggest that reason itself is defective, while “premodernists” argue we can regain our balance by returning to premodern rationalism. Peter Berkowitz suggests, however, that Nietzsche is a contradictory thinker who fails in his attempt to combine ancient rationalism with modern voluntarism. Postmodernism thus rests upon a defective foundation. Berkowitz's critique of postmodernism is telling, but he does not recognize dangerous millenarian elements in Nietzsche's thought. Moreover, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Towards Nazism: On the Invention of Plato’s Political Philosophy.Mauro Bonazzi - 2020 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 12 (3):182-196.
    ABSTRACT The image of Plato captured in Raphael’s School of Athens as the champion of contemplative life has been celebrated for centuries. Such a description of Plato, however, would probably be surprising for most readers who are used to a very different Plato. For many current readers, Plato is a political philosopher. The contrast could not be sharper. The goal of this paper is to reconstruct the origins of the political interpretation of Plato’s thought. Prior to Popper, this interpretation was (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • „Werde, der du bist!“. Selbsterkenntnis, Handeln und Selbstgestaltung bei Nietzsche in einem Ineditum von Georges Canguilhem.Marco Brusotti - 2021 - Nietzsche Studien 50 (1):181-216.
    In an unpublished text from the early postwar period, Georges Canguilhem deals with Nietzsche’s maxim “Become who you are!” Is this “apparently contradictory formula of a philosopher full of contradictions” really only seemingly inconsistent? Canguilhem regards it as a norm whose supposed metaphysical or objective content dissolves upon further analysis. So he here discerns a new instance of the same potential confusion he had already addressed in his classical essay on The Normal and the Pathological (1943). According to him, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation