Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What about process? Limitations in advance directives, care planning, and noncapacitated decision making.Jeffrey T. Berger - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):33 – 34.
    Just as noncapacitated decision making will forever be a feature of clinical medicine, so will the quest for effective advance care planning and serviceable documentation of these preferences. “Re-...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Building a better advance directive: Next steps.David I. Shalowitz & Maria J. Silveira - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):34 – 36.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?Jeffrey T. Berger - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (1):45-49.
    The ‘best interests’ decision making standard is used in clinical care to make necessary health decisions for non-capacitated individuals for whom neither explicit nor inferred wishes are known. It has been also widely acknowledged as a basis for enrolling some non-capacitated adults into clinical research such as emergency, critical care, and dementia research. However, the best interests standard requires that choices provide the highest net benefit of available options, and clinical research rarely meets this criterion. In the context of modern (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Misadventures in CPR: Neglecting Nonmaleficent and Advocacy Obligations.Jeffrey T. Berger - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):20-21.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 11, Page 20-21, November 2011.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation