Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Reductionism about understanding why.Insa Lawler - 2016 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116 (2):229-236.
    Paulina Sliwa (2015) argues that knowing why p is necessary and sufficient for understanding why p. She tries to rebut recent attacks against the necessity and sufficiency claims, and explains the gradability of understanding why in terms of knowledge. I argue that her attempts do not succeed, but I indicate more promising ways to defend reductionism about understanding why throughout the discussion.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Conceptualisation of event roles in L1 and L2 by Japanese learners of English: a cross-linguistic comparison of perspectives of event construal. [REVIEW]Jiashen Qu & Koji Miwa - forthcoming - Cognitive Linguistics.
    Events can be perceived from different perspectives. Langacker, Ronald W. (1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 5–38) typologically categorised the perspectives in event construal as subjective construal and objective construal based on how egocentric a perspective is. Compared with Western languages, such as English, Japanese is argued to be a language that favours subjective construal. However, little empirical work has tested this assumption directly. We investigated whether Japanese and English construe events from different perspectives by focusing on the linguistic encodings of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Stronger Syntactic Alignment in the Presence of an Interlocutor.Lotte Schoot, Peter Hagoort & Katrien Segaert - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How do people interpret implausible sentences?Zhenguang G. Cai, Nan Zhao & Martin J. Pickering - 2022 - Cognition 225 (C):105101.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Event Structures Drive Semantic Structural Priming, Not Thematic Roles: Evidence From Idioms and Light Verbs.Jayden Ziegler, Jesse Snedeker & Eva Wittenberg - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (8):2918-2949.
    What are the semantic representations that underlie language production? We use structural priming to distinguish between two competing theories. Thematic roles define semantic structure in terms of atomic units that specify event participants and are ordered with respect to each other through a hierarchy of roles. Event structures instead instantiate semantic structure as embedded sub‐predicates that impose an order on verbal arguments based on their relative positioning in these embeddings. Across two experiments, we found that priming for datives depended on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Syntactic levels, lexicalism, and ellipsis: The jury is still out.Robert J. Hartsuiker & Sarah Bernolet - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Using structural priming to test links between constructions: English caused-motion and resultative sentences inhibit each other.Tobias Ungerer - 2021 - Cognitive Linguistics 32 (3):389-420.
    Cognitive-linguistic theories commonly model speakers’ grammatical knowledge as a network of constructions related by a variety of associative links. The present study proposes that structural priming can provide psycholinguistic evidence of such links, and crucially, that the method can be extended to non-alternating constructions. In a comprehension priming experiment using the “maze” variant of self-paced reading, English caused-motion sentences were found to have an inhibitory effect by slowing down participants’ subsequent processing of resultatives, and vice versa, providing evidence that speakers (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The comprehension of anomalous sentences: Evidence from structural priming.Iva Ivanova, Martin J. Pickering, Holly P. Branigan, Janet F. McLean & Albert Costa - 2012 - Cognition 122 (2):193-209.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals.Sarah Bernolet, Robert J. Hartsuiker & Martin J. Pickering - 2013 - Cognition 127 (3):287-306.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • How broad are thematic roles? Evidence from structural priming.Jayden Ziegler & Jesse Snedeker - 2018 - Cognition 179 (C):221-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • It is there whether you hear it or not: Syntactic representation of missing arguments.Zhenguang G. Cai, Martin J. Pickering, Ruiming Wang & Holly P. Branigan - 2015 - Cognition 136 (C):255-267.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Structural Priming and Frequency Effects Interact in Chinese Sentence Comprehension.Hang Wei, Yanping Dong, Julie E. Boland & Fang Yuan - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How abstract is syntax? Evidence from structural priming.Jayden Ziegler, Giulia Bencini, Adele Goldberg & Jesse Snedeker - 2019 - Cognition 193 (C):104045.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full passives.Katherine Messenger, Holly P. Branigan & Janet F. McLean - 2011 - Cognition 121 (2):268-274.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations