Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.Nicholas Yue Shuen Yoon, Yun Ting Ong, Hong Wei Yap, Kuang Teck Tay, Elijah Gin Lim, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Wei Qiang Lim, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Ying Pin Toh, Min Chiam, Stephen Mason & Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-11.
    BackgroundAmidst expanding roles in education and policy making, questions have been raised about the ability of Clinical Ethics Committees (CEC) s to carry out effective ethics consultations (CECons). However recent reviews of CECs suggest that there is no uniformity to CECons and no effective means of assessing the quality of CECons. To address this gap a systematic scoping review of prevailing tools used to assess CECons was performed to foreground and guide the design of a tool to evaluate the quality (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Reflections on the success of hospital ethics committees in my health system.Earl D. White - 2006 - HEC Forum 18 (4):349-356.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reflections on the Success of Hospital Ethics Committees in my Health System.I. I. White - 2006 - HEC Forum 18 (4):349-356.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: the Hub and Spokes Strategy.S. MacRae - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (5):256-261.
    The “lone” clinical bioethicist working in a large, multisite hospital faces considerable challenges. While attempting to build ethics capacity and sustain a demanding range of responsibilities, he or she must also achieve an acceptable level of integration, sustainability, and accountability within a complex organisational structure. In an effort to address such inherent demands and to create a platform towards better evaluation and effectiveness, the Clinical Ethics Group at the Joint Centre for Bioethics at the University of Toronto is implementing the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Team members perspectives on conflicts in clinical ethics committees.Anika Scherer, Bernd Alt-Epping, Friedemann Nauck & Gabriella Marx - 2019 - Nursing Ethics 26 (7-8):2098-2112.
    Background:Clinical ethics committees have been broadly implemented in university hospitals, general hospitals and nursing homes. To ensure the quality of ethics consultations, evaluation should be...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • HEC member perspectives on the case analysis process: A qualitative multi-site study. [REVIEW]Eric Racine - 2007 - HEC Forum 19 (3):185-206.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Functioning of Hospital Ethics Committees: A Multiple-Case Study of Four Canadian Committees. [REVIEW]Alice Gaudine, Marianne Lamb, Sandra M. LeFort & Linda Thorne - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (3):225-238.
    A multiple-case study of four hospital ethics committees in Canada was conducted and data collected included interviews with key informants, observation of committee meetings and ethics-related hospital documents, such as policies and committee minutes. We compared the hospital committees in terms of their structure, functioning and perceptions of key informants and found variation in the dimensions of empowerment, organizational culture of ethics, breadth of ethics mandate, achievements, dynamism, and expertise.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations