Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A critical realist method for applied business research.John McAvoy & Tom Butler - 2018 - Journal of Critical Realism 17 (2):160-175.
    ABSTRACTWhile the business research community has moved from describing critical realism as simply a compromise philosophy between positivists and interpretivists to its acceptance in its own right, it still lacks a choice of methods or processes for the business researcher to utilize. This paper presents a proposed method that can be used by business researchers who follow the critical realist paradigm. It explores the suitability of a critical realist approach to applied business and the importance of combining the ontological and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The AART of Ethnography: A Critical Realist Explanatory Research Model.Claire Laurier Decoteau - 2017 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 47 (1):58-82.
    Critical realism is a philosophy of science, which has made significant contributions to epistemic debates within sociology. And yet, its contributions to ethnographic explanation have yet to be fully elaborated. Drawing on ethnographic data on the health-seeking behavior of HIV-infected South Africans, the paper compares and contrasts critical realism with grounded theory, extended case method and the pragmatist method of abduction. In so doing, it argues that critical realism makes a significant contribution to causal explanation in ethnographic research in three (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Guessing and Abduction.Mark Tschaepe - 2014 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50 (1):115.
    “Scientific research faces up with an open and unknown world”Within the work of C. S. Peirce, the most fundamental and contentious form of inference is that of abduction. According to Peirce, abduction is the only type of inference from which new ideas are created (CP 5.171, 1903). He wrote, “every single item of scientific theory which stands established today has been due to Abduction” (CP 5.172, 1903). Similarly, “All that makes knowledge applicable comes to us viâ abduction. […] Not the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Logical Goodness of Abduction in C. S. Peirce's Thought.Chihab El Khachab - 2013 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49 (2):157.
    “What is abduction?” asks Jaakko Hintikka in the title to his 1998 article on C. S. Peirce’s concept. The answer to Hintikka’s question is problematic on several counts. There is, to begin with, a difference between Peirce’s own views on abduction and later interpretations of abduction as “inference to the best explanation” (Minnameier 2004; Paavola 2006). There are, furthermore, tensions within Peirce’s own account of abduction, for instance, a tension between “inferential” and “instinctual” aspects of abduction (Fann 1970; Anderson 1986; (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Logical Goodness of Abduction in C. S. Peirce's Thought.Chihab El Khachab - 2013 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49 (2):31.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark